Vilius Gaubas vs Ignacio Buse — Menorca CH Semi-final

Menorca CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
LTU7
Vilius Gaubas
#128ATP
1581ELO
1535Clay ELO
$275kYTD
$759kCAREER
21 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 31 March 2025
clay
Ignacio Buse
PER
Ignacio Buse
#33ATP
1822ELO
1786Clay ELO
$949kYTD
$1.4MCAREER
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWWW
Gaubas V.
6-4 4-6 6-4
Buse I.
Gaubas V.
6462
Buse I.
4641

Vilius Gaubas defeated Ignacio Buse 6-4 4-6 6-4 in the Menorca CH semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Ignacio Buse came in ranked #33.

Key context

  • Match story: Vilius Gaubas edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 4–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gaubas V.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Buse I.

Buse I.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Gaubas V.

Serve advantage — Buse I.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Gaubas V.Buse I.
—
Serve
41
—
Return
14

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Gaubas V.Buse I.
1st serve in·Slight edge
69%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.9
3.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.0
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (97 vs 97). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gaubas V.Buse I.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
57
63
Break points saved·Even
87
87
Break points won·Clear edge
52
28
Deciding sets·Slight edge
86
80
Tiebreaks·Dominant
8
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gaubas V.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Buse I.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.9Clay Elo 1535
Surface ELO
6.1+252 Clay Elo edge
4.1Overall Elo 1581
ELO gap
5.9Overall Elo 1822
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
5.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
8.1
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gaubas V.Buse I.
Freshness·Clear edge
81
94

Gaubas V.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 48 games (7d) · Buse I.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Gaubas V.[7]
Martin Tiffon P.
6-06-4
Semi-finals
Martin Tiffon P.
Neumayer L.
6-34-66-3
Gaubas V.[7]
Buse I.
6-44-66-4
Quarter-finals
Martin Tiffon P.
Taberner C.[5]
4-66-46-3
Neumayer L.
Moller E.[4]
6-36-4
Buse I.
Piros Z.
7-646-3
Gaubas V.[7]
Ofner S.[2]
7-626-2
R16
Buse I.
Rincon D.
6-06-1
Martin Tiffon P.
Ramos A.
6-16-4
Moller E.[4]
Hassan B.
7-676-0
Piros Z.
Choinski J.[6]
6-46-4
Gaubas V.[7]
Gea A.
7-56-3
Ofner S.[2]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-17-60
Taberner C.[5]
Merida Aguilar D.
3-67-56-0
Neumayer L.
Cachin P.
7-626-0
R32
Moller E.[4]
Alcala Gurri M.
6-36-3
Hassan B.
Alvarez Varona N.
7-616-3
Ofner S.[2]
Andreev A.
6-22-0
Martin Tiffon P.
Engel J.
6-43-66-3
Merida Aguilar D.
Hardt N.
6-736-46-2
Taberner C.[5]
Yevseyev D.
6-24-66-1
Choinski J.[6]
Roca Batalla O.
7-647-5
Piros Z.
Vavassori A.
5-76-36-1
Rincon D.
Coppejans K.
6-736-46-2
Buse I.
Cilic M.[3]
6-26-1
Neumayer L.
Virgili Berini F.
6-36-4
Cachin P.
Butvilas E.[8]
6-26-3
Gaubas V.[7]
Squire H.
6-07-65
Gea A.
Campana Lee G.
6-34-66-0
Ramos A.
Harris B.[1]
6-24-66-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Feldbausch K.
6-23-66-4