Cristina Bucsa vs Leonie Kung — Bogota Round of 32

Bogota · WTA · Round of 32
Cristina Bucsa
ESP8
Cristina Bucsa
#41WTA
1722ELO
1563Clay ELO
$900kYTD
$5.0MCAREER
28 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 31 March 2025
clay
SUI
Leonie Kung
#881WTA
1268ELO
1227Clay ELO
25 yrs · 176 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWL
Bucsa C.
6-1 6-7 6-1
Kung L.
Bucsa C.
66262
Kung L.
17711

Cristina Bucsa defeated Leonie Kung 6-1 6-7 6-1 in the Bogota round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Cristina Bucsa came in ranked #41, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Cristina Bucsa came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 6–7 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bucsa C.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Kung L.

Kung L.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Bucsa C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bucsa C.Kung L.
1st serve in·Even
65%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
58%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
46%
Service points won·Even
57%
54%
Return points won·Even
45%
43%
Break points saved·Even
57%
55%
Aces / match·Even
1.1
1.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (78 vs 40). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bucsa C.Kung L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
60
0
Break points saved·Dominant
79
29
Break points won·Dominant
93
61
Deciding sets·Dominant
68
3
Tiebreaks·
27
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bucsa C.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Kung L.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.7+336 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.3Clay Elo 1227
10.0Overall Elo 1722
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1268
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
5.9
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Osorio C.[2]
Kawa K.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Osorio C.[2]
Riera J.
6-47-5
Kawa K.
Pareja J.
7-56-2
Quarter-finals
Osorio C.[2]
Maria T.[6]
6-16-3
Kawa K.
Bouzkova M.[1]
5-76-17-5
Pareja J.
Jeanjean L.
7-656-3
Riera J.
Boskovic L.
6-32-66-1
R16
Kawa K.
Pigossi L.
1-67-656-3
Boskovic L.
Bucsa C.[8]
6-16-4
Maria T.[6]
Chang H.
6-07-60
Pareja J.
Tig P.
6-37-63
Bouzkova M.[1]
Serban R.
6-16-3
Jeanjean L.
Janicijevic S.
6-46-3
Riera J.
Jovic I.
6-46-2
Osorio C.[2]
Bektas E.
1-67-656-2
R32
Kawa K.
Mediorreal Arias V.
6-16-1
Jeanjean L.
Von Deichmann K.
6-47-5
Riera J.
Jones F.
6-25-75-3
Maria T.[6]
Paquet C.
6-757-56-4
Pigossi L.
Siegemund L.[5]
4-66-16-1
Bouzkova M.[1]
Krunic A.
6-03-66-3
Tig P.
Arango E.[4]
6-36-3
Pareja J.
Sanchez Uribe M.
6-16-1
Janicijevic S.
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
6-16-2
Bucsa C.[8]
Kung L.
6-16-726-1
Bektas E.
Torres Murcia M.
6-06-3
Osorio C.[2]
Higuita Barraza M.
6-06-1
Boskovic L.
Bara I.
6-46-4
Jovic I.
Parks A.[3]
6-16-4
Chang H.
Lepchenko V.
4-66-16-2
Serban R.
Parrizas Diaz N.
2-66-46-1