Filip Misolic vs Bernabe Zapata Miralles — Girona CH Round of 32

Girona CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Filip Misolic
AUT
Filip Misolic
#293ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 March 2025
clay
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
ESP
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
1413ELO
1407Clay ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Misolic F.
6-3 6-3
Zapata Miralles B.
Misolic F.
662
Zapata Miralles B.
330

Filip Misolic defeated Bernabe Zapata Miralles 6-3 6-3 in the Girona CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Misolic F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Zapata Miralles B.

Zapata Miralles B.serving54% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Serve advantage — Misolic F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Misolic F.Zapata Miralles B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
70%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
60%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
55%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
50%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.5
1.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (84 vs 41). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Misolic F.Zapata Miralles B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
79
49
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
74
Break points won·Dominant
53
80
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
56
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Misolic F.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Zapata Miralles B.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.2+257 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.8Clay Elo 1407
7.1Overall Elo 1587
ELO gap
2.9Overall Elo 1413
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.1
Surface form
2.3
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
8.5
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cilic M.
Moller E.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Cilic M.
De Jong J.[4]
6-46-4
Moller E.
Lajovic D.[5]
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Cilic M.
Carreno Busta P.[6]
6-26-4
Lajovic D.[5]
Skatov T.
6-26-4
Moller E.
Hassan B.
6-37-63
De Jong J.[4]
Ofner S.
4-66-17-5
R16
Hassan B.
Blanchet U.
6-756-06-3
Skatov T.
Albot R.
6-43-67-63
Cilic M.
Fucsovics M.[1]
6-757-646-2
Lajovic D.[5]
Moro Canas A.
6-26-2
Ofner S.
Neumayer L.
4-66-26-2
Carreno Busta P.[6]
Radulov I.
6-25-77-64
De Jong J.[4]
Misolic F.
6-36-1
Moller E.
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-46-0
R32
Fucsovics M.[1]
Gaubas V.
6-36-2
Cilic M.
Taberner C.
6-46-3
Radulov I.
Landaluce M.
6-37-5
Carreno Busta P.[6]
Cachin P.
6-16-3
Ofner S.
Cerundolo J.[8]
7-646-4
Lajovic D.[5]
Squire H.
6-47-5
Moro Canas A.
Choinski J.
6-36-4
Moller E.
Coria F.[7]
7-646-2
Budkov Kjaer N.
Engel J.
6-43-67-65
Hassan B.
Shevchenko A.[2]
6-41-66-4
Misolic F.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-36-3
Albot R.
Ramos A.
4-66-36-4
Blanchet U.
Trungelliti M.
3-66-16-2
De Jong J.[4]
Droguet T.
6-36-2
Skatov T.
Dellien H.[3]
6-16-3
Neumayer L.
Rocha H.
6-46-2