Bernard Tomic vs Mark Lajal — Morelia CH Round of 16

Morelia CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 March 2025
hard
EST
Mark Lajal
#159ATP
1589ELO
1556Hard ELO
$97kYTD
$654kCAREER
23 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLW
Tomic B.
6-2 3-6 7-6
Lajal M.
Tomic B.
63782
Lajal M.
26661

Bernard Tomic defeated Mark Lajal 6-2 3-6 7-6 in the Morelia CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Bernard Tomic closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Lajal M.

Lajal M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Serve advantage — Lajal M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Lajal M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
64%
63%
Aces / match·Even
5.7
5.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.6
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 91). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tomic B.Lajal M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
53
43
Break points saved·Even
92
89
Break points won·Slight edge
4
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
42
Tiebreaks·Even
79
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Lajal M.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 52 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
4.2Hard Elo 1441
Surface ELO
5.8+115 Hard Elo edge
4.2Overall Elo 1475
ELO gap
5.8Overall Elo 1589
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.3
Surface form
6.2
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Lajal M.
Freshness·Slight edge
81
86

Tomic B.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d) · Lajal M.: 4 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Popko D.
Duckworth J.[1]
1-66-26-4
Semi-finals
Popko D.
Grenier H.
6-26-1
Duckworth J.[1]
Zhukayev B.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[1]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-47-66
Zhukayev B.
Huesler M.
6-36-726-4
Popko D.
Tirante T.[4]
6-16-4
Grenier H.
Tomic B.
2-67-646-2
R16
Tomic B.
Lajal M.
6-23-67-66
Hernandez Serrano J.
Ficovich J.[8]
7-56-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Zink T.
7-56-3
Huesler M.
Trotter J.
6-46-4
Zhukayev B.
Meligeni Alves F.
7-656-4
Grenier H.
Eubanks C.[2]
6-46-4
Popko D.
Mannarino A.[5]
6-26-3
Tirante T.[4]
Cassone M.
6-36-746-3
R32
Duckworth J.[1]
Rubio Fierros A.
6-16-3
Hernandez Serrano J.
Mejia N.
6-43-66-4
Ficovich J.[8]
Svajda Z.
6-46-3
Meligeni Alves F.
Galarneau A.[7]
4-67-646-4
Tirante T.[4]
Neuchrist M.
7-676-4
Zhukayev B.
Rodionov J.
6-16-3
Popko D.
Atmane T.
7-666-746-3
Trotter J.
Mccabe J.
6-797-617-63
Eubanks C.[2]
Lestienne C.
6-43-0
Huesler M.
Holt B.[3]
6-46-1
Zink T.
Perez A.
6-47-63
Tomic B.
Mochizuki S.[6]
6-16-736-4
Mannarino A.[5]
Napolitano S.
6-36-2
Lajal M.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-17-66
Grenier H.
Pannu K.
6-46-4
Cassone M.
Ejupovic E.
4-66-36-2