Emilio Nava vs Nicolas Kicker — Concepcion CH Final

Concepcion CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Emilio Nava
USA8
Emilio Nava
#86ATP
1704ELO
1686Clay ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 March 2025
clay
Nicolas Kicker
ARG
Nicolas Kicker
#327ATP
1385ELO
1373Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
Nava E.
6-1 7-6
Kicker N.
Nava E.
6772
Kicker N.
1630

Emilio Nava defeated Nicolas Kicker 6-1 7-6 in the Concepcion CH final on clay. The result followed the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #86.

Key context

  • Match story: Emilio Nava came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nava E.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Kicker N.

Kicker N.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Nava E.Kicker N.
23
Serve
—
3
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nava E.Kicker N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.6
1.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (120 vs 82). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nava E.Kicker N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
52
30
Break points saved·Dominant
94
56
Break points won·Dominant
17
45
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
30
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nava E.
8.2
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Kicker N.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.1+313 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.9Clay Elo 1373
9.4Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
0.6Overall Elo 1385
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.5
Surface form
4.0
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
0.0
Minutes 14d
7.8
0.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nava E.Kicker N.
Freshness·Even
96
100

Nava E.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Kicker N.: 16 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nava E.[8]
Kicker N.
6-17-63
Semi-finals
Kicker N.
Soto M.
4-67-56-3
Nava E.[8]
Olivieri G.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Soto M.
Burruchaga R.[3]
7-56-4
Nava E.[8]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-26-3
Olivieri G.
Galan D.[2]
7-686-4
Kicker N.
Justo G.
6-41-66-1
R16
Kicker N.
Varillas J.
6-06-1
Burruchaga R.[3]
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-14-66-3
Soto M.
Aboian V.
7-653-66-1
Nava E.[8]
Bueno G.
6-06-3
Olivieri G.
Collarini A.[7]
6-737-656-3
Justo G.
Olivo R.
7-56-4
Reis Da Silva J.
Boscardin Dias P.
2-67-56-3
Galan D.[2]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-46-3
R32
Olivo R.
Villalon N.
6-36-3
Varillas J.
Casanova H.
6-27-5
Kicker N.
Vallejo A.[6]
6-16-1
Burruchaga R.[3]
Torres J.
6-27-5
Huertas Del Pino C.
Orlov V.
6-37-64
Soto M.
Nesterov P.
6-16-4
Bueno G.
Dedura Palomero D.
6-36-2
Boscardin Dias P.
Couacaud E.
7-694-66-4
Reis Da Silva J.
Barrios Vera T.[4]
6-36-2
Olivieri G.
Villanueva G.
7-56-1
Galan D.[2]
Bertola R.
6-36-1
Aboian V.
Mena F.[5]
6-35-76-1
Nava E.[8]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-26-4
Justo G.
Mochizuki Y.
6-36-1
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Guillen Meza A.
6-26-3
Collarini A.[7]
Pereira J.
6-17-5