Jesper De Jong vs Titouan Droguet — Girona CH Round of 32

Girona CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jesper De Jong
NED4
Jesper De Jong
#73ATP
1711ELO
1696Clay ELO
$612kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 March 2025
clay
Titouan Droguet
FRA
Titouan Droguet
#119ATP
1717ELO
1681Clay ELO
$273kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
25 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
De Jong J.
6-3 6-2
Droguet T.
De Jong J.
662
Droguet T.
320

Jesper De Jong defeated Titouan Droguet 6-3 6-2 in the Girona CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Jesper De Jong came in ranked #73, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's quarter-final. Jesper De Jong extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-11-04MetzQ2hardJesper De Jong6-2 4-6 7-6(5)

Serve vs return

This season
De Jong J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Droguet T.

Droguet T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs De Jong J.

Serve advantage — Droguet T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

De Jong J.Droguet T.
49
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
De Jong J.Droguet T.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
63%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Even
6.9
7.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (83 vs 97). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Jong J.Droguet T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
56
64
Break points saved·Even
90
88
Break points won·Clear edge
37
17
Deciding sets·Clear edge
69
93
Tiebreaks·Dominant
57
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Jong J.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Droguet T.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.3+15 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.7Clay Elo 1681
4.1Overall Elo 1711
ELO gap
5.9Overall Elo 1717
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
7.5
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.4
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
De Jong J.Droguet T.
Freshness·Dominant
92
60

De Jong J.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Droguet T.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 100 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cilic M.
Moller E.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Cilic M.
De Jong J.[4]
6-46-4
Moller E.
Lajovic D.[5]
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Cilic M.
Carreno Busta P.[6]
6-26-4
Lajovic D.[5]
Skatov T.
6-26-4
Moller E.
Hassan B.
6-37-63
De Jong J.[4]
Ofner S.
4-66-17-5
R16
Hassan B.
Blanchet U.
6-756-06-3
Skatov T.
Albot R.
6-43-67-63
Cilic M.
Fucsovics M.[1]
6-757-646-2
Lajovic D.[5]
Moro Canas A.
6-26-2
Ofner S.
Neumayer L.
4-66-26-2
Carreno Busta P.[6]
Radulov I.
6-25-77-64
De Jong J.[4]
Misolic F.
6-36-1
Moller E.
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-46-0
R32
Fucsovics M.[1]
Gaubas V.
6-36-2
Cilic M.
Taberner C.
6-46-3
Radulov I.
Landaluce M.
6-37-5
Carreno Busta P.[6]
Cachin P.
6-16-3
Ofner S.
Cerundolo J.[8]
7-646-4
Lajovic D.[5]
Squire H.
6-47-5
Moro Canas A.
Choinski J.
6-36-4
Moller E.
Coria F.[7]
7-646-2
Budkov Kjaer N.
Engel J.
6-43-67-65
Hassan B.
Shevchenko A.[2]
6-41-66-4
Misolic F.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-36-3
Albot R.
Ramos A.
4-66-36-4
Blanchet U.
Trungelliti M.
3-66-16-2
De Jong J.[4]
Droguet T.
6-36-2
Skatov T.
Dellien H.[3]
6-16-3
Neumayer L.
Rocha H.
6-46-2