Radu Albot vs Albert Ramos — Girona CH Round of 32

Girona CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Radu Albot
MDA
Radu Albot
#490ATP
1453ELO
1440Clay ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 March 2025
clay
ESP
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1526Clay ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Albot R.
4-6 6-3 6-4
Ramos A.
Albot R.
4662
Ramos A.
6341

Radu Albot defeated Albert Ramos 4-6 6-3 6-4 in the Girona CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Albert Ramos came in defending last year's round of 32, but Radu Albot had been the form player, winning 5 of their last 9 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Albot R.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Ramos A.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Albot R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Albot R.Ramos A.
1st serve in·Even
65%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
57%
61%
Aces / match·Even
1.7
2.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (73 vs 29). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Albot R.Ramos A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
46
59
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
95
Break points won·Dominant
19
49
Deciding sets·Even
76
80
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
29
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Albot R.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Ramos A.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.8Clay Elo 1440
Surface ELO
6.2+86 Clay Elo edge
3.6Overall Elo 1453
ELO gap
6.4Overall Elo 1558
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
6.1
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.8
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Albot R.Ramos A.
Freshness·
93
—

Albot R.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cilic M.
Moller E.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Cilic M.
De Jong J.[4]
6-46-4
Moller E.
Lajovic D.[5]
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Cilic M.
Carreno Busta P.[6]
6-26-4
Lajovic D.[5]
Skatov T.
6-26-4
Moller E.
Hassan B.
6-37-63
De Jong J.[4]
Ofner S.
4-66-17-5
R16
Hassan B.
Blanchet U.
6-756-06-3
Skatov T.
Albot R.
6-43-67-63
Cilic M.
Fucsovics M.[1]
6-757-646-2
Lajovic D.[5]
Moro Canas A.
6-26-2
Ofner S.
Neumayer L.
4-66-26-2
Carreno Busta P.[6]
Radulov I.
6-25-77-64
De Jong J.[4]
Misolic F.
6-36-1
Moller E.
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-46-0
R32
Fucsovics M.[1]
Gaubas V.
6-36-2
Cilic M.
Taberner C.
6-46-3
Radulov I.
Landaluce M.
6-37-5
Carreno Busta P.[6]
Cachin P.
6-16-3
Ofner S.
Cerundolo J.[8]
7-646-4
Lajovic D.[5]
Squire H.
6-47-5
Moro Canas A.
Choinski J.
6-36-4
Moller E.
Coria F.[7]
7-646-2
Budkov Kjaer N.
Engel J.
6-43-67-65
Hassan B.
Shevchenko A.[2]
6-41-66-4
Misolic F.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-36-3
Albot R.
Ramos A.
4-66-36-4
Blanchet U.
Trungelliti M.
3-66-16-2
De Jong J.[4]
Droguet T.
6-36-2
Skatov T.
Dellien H.[3]
6-16-3
Neumayer L.
Rocha H.
6-46-2