Chun Hsin Tseng vs Darwin Blanch — Miami Masters Qualifying Round 2

Miami Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 2
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE11
Chun Hsin Tseng
#229ATP
1554ELO
1495Hard ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Wednesday, 19 March 2025
hard
USA
Darwin Blanch
#224ATP
1551ELO
1483Hard ELO
18 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWLW
Tseng C.
6-4 1-6 7-6
Blanch D.
Tseng C.
61772
Blanch D.
46641

Chun Hsin Tseng defeated Darwin Blanch 6-4 1-6 7-6 in the Miami Masters qualifying round 2 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Darwin Blanch came in ranked #224, defending last year's round of 128.

Key context

  • Match story: Chun Hsin Tseng closed it out in three sets, 6–4 1–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tseng C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Blanch D.

Blanch D.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tseng C.Blanch D.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.0
6.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (95 vs 58). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tseng C.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Blanch D.
3.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 121 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
4.7+12 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.3Hard Elo 1483
4.2Overall Elo 1554
ELO gap
5.8Overall Elo 1551
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.4
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 10
Fatigue & Travel
6.4
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Country comfort
4.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tseng C.Blanch D.
Freshness·Dominant
100
65

Tseng C.: 20 days rest · Blanch D.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 74 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
25°CClear
Wind 4 km/hHumidity 48%
Q2
Quinn E.
Ugo Carabelli C.[1]
7-623-66-2
Harris B.[13]
Gaston H.[7]
7-56-2
Oconnell C.[4]
Trungelliti M.
6-26-3
Comesana F.[2]
Mochizuki S.
7-647-5
Tirante T.
Shevchenko A.[10]
6-36-3
Sakamoto R.
Duckworth J.[9]
7-57-65
Tseng C.[11]
Blanch D.
6-41-67-64
Schoolkate T.[24]
Walton A.[8]
6-36-4
Fearnley J.[5]
Boyer T.[20]
6-26-4
Blockx A.
Atmane T.
6-46-4
Mcdonald M.[15]
Kotov P.[12]
6-26-2
Holt B.[17]
Diallo G.[6]
6-42-67-5
Q1
Mochizuki S.
Hanfmann Y.[16]
7-656-4
Schoolkate T.[24]
Napolitano S.
6-36-756-1
Diallo G.[6]
Watanuki Y.
6-16-736-3
Sakamoto R.
Majchrzak K.[22]
6-46-756-2
Tseng C.[11]
Moro Canas A.
7-666-2
Fearnley J.[5]
Boogaard T.
6-46-3
Trungelliti M.
Ritschard A.[21]
6-45-76-3
Atmane T.
Nardi L.[3]
6-37-64
Oconnell C.[4]
Draxl L.
7-56-0
Ugo Carabelli C.[1]
Krueger M.
6-23-66-3
Blanch D.
Daniel T.[19]
6-786-06-3
Walton A.[8]
Kukushkin M.
6-16-4
Harris B.[13]
Ymer M.
6-767-656-3
Quinn E.
Mannarino A.[23]
3-66-46-2
Mcdonald M.[15]
Basilashvili N.
6-16-743-2
Blockx A.
Virtanen O.[18]
3-66-46-3
Duckworth J.[9]
Gomez F.
7-57-5
Kotov P.[12]
Galarneau A.
4-66-26-1
Gaston H.[7]
Habib H.
6-26-4
Comesana F.[2]
Mmoh M.
6-36-4
Shevchenko A.[10]
Klein L.
6-37-65
Holt B.[17]
Damm M.
4-66-26-2
Tirante T.
Lajovic D.[14]
6-46-3
Boyer T.[20]
Uchiyama Y.
6-36-726-1