Tyler Zink vs Vladyslav Orlov — Merida CH Round of 32

Merida CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Tyler Zink
#330ATP
1371ELO
1294Clay ELO
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 March 2025
clay
UKR
Vladyslav Orlov
#493ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWWLW
Zink T.
6-4 6-0
Orlov V.
Zink T.
662
Orlov V.
400

Tyler Zink defeated Vladyslav Orlov 6-4 6-0 in the Merida CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zink T.serving70% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Orlov V.

Orlov V.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Zink T.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zink T.Orlov V.
1st serve in·Even
57%
55%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
58%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
52%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.6
2.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 30). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zink T.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Orlov V.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 154 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
4.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Zink T.Orlov V.
Freshness·
79
—

Zink T.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 59 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Meligeni Alves F.[4]
Ficovich J.[3]
6-21-66-2
Semi-finals
Meligeni Alves F.[4]
Garin C.[2]
6-766-36-4
Ficovich J.[3]
Dellien H.[1]
6-35-77-5
Quarter-finals
Ficovich J.[3]
Johns G.
6-36-4
Meligeni Alves F.[4]
Prado Angelo J.
6-16-0
Garin C.[2]
Pacheco Mendez R.[7]
6-36-1
Dellien H.[1]
Olivo R.
6-26-0
R16
Meligeni Alves F.[4]
Maloney P.
7-656-3
Pacheco Mendez R.[7]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-37-5
Dellien H.[1]
Sheehy J.
6-36-756-3
Olivo R.
Tomic B.[5]
6-43-67-64
Ficovich J.[3]
Zink T.
6-36-4
Garin C.[2]
Nesterov P.
6-46-3
Prado Angelo J.
Popko D.[6]
7-51-67-64
Johns G.
Couacaud E.[8]
4-67-56-3
R32
Prado Angelo J.
Martin D.
1-66-16-4
Dellien H.[1]
Janvier M.
7-56-3
Sheehy J.
Mayo A.
6-11-67-62
Olivo R.
Wiskandt M.
6-43-66-3
Tomic B.[5]
Ejupovic E.
6-07-5
Ficovich J.[3]
Poling K.
6-47-5
Johns G.
Gima S.
6-46-4
Couacaud E.[8]
Feldbausch K.
6-36-2
Popko D.[6]
Andrade A.
6-36-4
Meligeni Alves F.[4]
Alujas R.
6-36-4
Maloney P.
Rubio Fierros A.
6-27-610
Hernandez Serrano J.
Hilderbrand T.
6-46-2
Nesterov P.
Catry R.
6-36-1
Garin C.[2]
Tobon M.
6-26-0
Zink T.
Orlov V.
6-46-0
Pacheco Mendez R.[7]
Nanda G.
6-06-1