Jesper De Jong vs Valentin Vacherot — Murcia CH Round of 16

Murcia CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Jesper De Jong
NED2
Jesper De Jong
#73ATP
1711ELO
1696Clay ELO
$612kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 March 2025
clay
Valentin Vacherot
MON
Valentin Vacherot
#21ATP
1903ELO
1789Clay ELO
$1.0MYTD
$3.5MCAREER
27 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWWWLWW
De Jong J.
6-3 3-6 7-5
Vacherot V.
De Jong J.
6372
Vacherot V.
3651

Jesper De Jong defeated Valentin Vacherot 6-3 3-6 7-5 in the Murcia CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Valentin Vacherot came in ranked #21, but Jesper De Jong had been the form player, winning 6 of their last 7 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Jesper De Jong closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
De Jong J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Vacherot V.

Vacherot V.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs De Jong J.

Serve advantage — Vacherot V.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

De Jong J.Vacherot V.
49
Serve
39
32
Return
54

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
De Jong J.Vacherot V.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
66%
Aces / match·Even
6.9
7.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (83 vs 85). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Jong J.Vacherot V.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
56
69
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
96
Break points won·Even
37
33
Deciding sets·Dominant
69
95
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
57
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Jong J.
3.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Vacherot V.
7.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.1Clay Elo 1696
Surface ELO
6.9+93 Clay Elo edge
1.7Overall Elo 1711
ELO gap
8.3Overall Elo 1903
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.1
Surface form
8.4
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
De Jong J.Vacherot V.
Freshness·
78
—

De Jong J.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 25 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Taberner C.
De Jong J.[2]
7-634-66-2
Semi-finals
Taberner C.
Coppejans K.
2-67-56-4
De Jong J.[2]
Gakhov I.
7-56-1
Quarter-finals
Taberner C.
Fucsovics M.[1]
7-55-77-63
Coppejans K.
Llamas Ruiz P.
6-46-3
De Jong J.[2]
Mayot H.[6]
W/O
Gakhov I.
Yevseyev D.
1-66-36-4
R16
Llamas Ruiz P.
Rincon D.
6-26-2
Fucsovics M.[1]
Hassan B.
7-56-3
Taberner C.
Merida Aguilar D.
7-617-62
Yevseyev D.
Jacquet K.[8]
4-66-30-0
Gakhov I.
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-47-62
De Jong J.[2]
Vacherot V.
6-33-67-5
Mayot H.[6]
Ramos A.
4-66-37-5
Coppejans K.
Moller E.
6-46-4
R32
Taberner C.
Gaubas V.
7-53-66-1
Merida Aguilar D.
Cilic M.[7]
6-26-4
Ramos A.
Zapata Miralles B.
3-66-46-3
Coppejans K.
Ofner S.[4]
6-16-746-3
Llamas Ruiz P.
Nagal S.[5]
6-46-1
Budkov Kjaer N.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-26-1
Mayot H.[6]
Butvilas E.
6-44-67-5
Vacherot V.
Brancaccio R.
7-636-766-3
Rincon D.
Pennaforti G.
6-06-3
Yevseyev D.
Engel J.
6-46-756-4
Fucsovics M.[1]
Rocha H.
6-26-3
De Jong J.[2]
Pellegrino A.
6-36-3
Gakhov I.
Carreno Busta P.[3]
6-36-4
Moller E.
Damas M.
4-67-56-4
Jacquet K.[8]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-37-64
Hassan B.
Blanchet U.
6-46-726-3