Sakura Hosogi vs Elena Micic — W35 Swan Hill Semi-final

W35 Swan Hill · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
JPN
Sakura Hosogi
#360WTA
1358ELO
1354Grass ELO
26 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLWW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 March 2025
grass
AUS
Elena Micic
#310WTA
1399ELO
1375Grass ELO
21 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLLLLWW
Hosogi S.
6-2 6-4
Micic E.
Hosogi S.
662
Micic E.
24–

Sakura Hosogi defeated Elena Micic 6-2 6-4 in the W35 Swan Hill semi-final on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hosogi S.serving56% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Micic E.

Micic E.serving51% hold

wins 50% of points on serve vs Hosogi S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hosogi S.Micic E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
73%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
59%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
45%
Service points won·Even
55%
56%
Return points won·Even
48%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
51%
Aces / match·Clear edge
0.5
2.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.7
4.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (68 vs 77). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hosogi S.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Micic E.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.2Grass Elo 1354
Surface ELO
4.8+20 Grass Elo edge
5.4Overall Elo 1358
ELO gap
4.6Overall Elo 1399
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
5.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
4.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Cabrera L.
Hosogi S.
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Cabrera L.
Da Silva Fick G.
6-36-4
Hosogi S.
Micic E.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Da Silva Fick G.
Tran D.
6-17-66
Hosogi S.
Mildren S.
6-06-3
Cabrera L.
Muramatsu C.
6-16-2
Micic E.
Ku Y.
5-77-56-2
R16
Mildren S.
Barry M.
6-46-0
Tran D.
Sandhu G.
7-646-3
Micic E.
Thompson B.
6-46-4
Hosogi S.
Smith A.
6-26-3
Cabrera L.
Miyamoto A.
6-36-3
Da Silva Fick G.
Ipunesso L.
6-36-4
Muramatsu C.
Varaksina A.
6-46-1
Ku Y.
Webb S.
6-46-4
R32
Webb S.
Subasic A.
6-16-2
Miyamoto A.
Kim Y.
6-16-2
Ku Y.
Yoshioka K.
6-26-3
Da Silva Fick G.
Korhonen C.
6-36-3
Muramatsu C.
Zylberman A.
6-26-0
Mildren S.
Eto N.
6-06-2
Tran D.
Hanatani N.
6-37-5
Barry M.
Kawamura M.
0-66-26-2
Sandhu G.
Cvijanovic J.
6-36-4
Smith A.
Rokusek S.
6-26-4
Cabrera L.
Khan L.
2-66-16-2
Hosogi S.
Gaft N.
6-26-2
Thompson B.
Wi H.
6-16-1
Micic E.
Delaunay C.
6-27-5
Ipunesso L.
Anghel A.
6-26-0
Varaksina A.
Compuesto B.
6-12-0