Alexandre Muller vs James Mccabe — Cap Cana CH Round of 16

Cap Cana CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Alexandre Muller
FRA1
Alexandre Muller
#132ATP
1665ELO
1630Hard ELO
$426kYTD
$4.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Tuesday, 11 March 2025
hard
AUS
James Mccabe
#242ATP
1532ELO
1481Hard ELO
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWLW
Muller A.
6-0 6-2
Mccabe J.
Muller A.
662
Mccabe J.
020

Alexandre Muller defeated James Mccabe 6-0 6-2 in the Cap Cana CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Alexandre Muller came in ranked #132, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Alexandre Muller extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-01-16Australian OpenQ1hardAlexandre Muller7-6(2) 6-7(4) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Muller A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Mccabe J.

Mccabe J.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Muller A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Muller A.Mccabe J.
11
Serve
—
13
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Muller A.Mccabe J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
35%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.5
8.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (69 vs 90). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Muller A.Mccabe J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
75
37
Break points saved·Slight edge
94
85
Break points won·Dominant
44
9
Deciding sets·Clear edge
95
71
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Muller A.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Mccabe J.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.3+149 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.7Hard Elo 1481
7.5Overall Elo 1665
ELO gap
2.5Overall Elo 1532
10.0
H2H
0.0
4.6
Surface form
6.9
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Muller A.Mccabe J.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
95

Muller A.: 15 days rest · Mccabe J.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Kovacevic A.
Dzumhur D.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Kovacevic A.
Muller A.[1]
6-42-67-65
Dzumhur D.
Mensik J.[5]
5-76-46-4
Quarter-finals
Muller A.[1]
Lestienne C.
7-666-4
Kovacevic A.
Altmaier D.
4-66-46-3
Mensik J.[5]
Etcheverry T.[2]
6-36-776-3
Dzumhur D.
Kecmanovic M.[3]
7-637-65
R16
Mensik J.[5]
Sakamoto R.
6-46-2
Muller A.[1]
Mccabe J.
6-06-2
Kovacevic A.
Wong C.
6-27-66
Etcheverry T.[2]
Mejia N.
6-26-4
Lestienne C.
Fognini F.
6-46-3
Altmaier D.
Goffin D.[4]
6-26-7126-3
Dzumhur D.
Bonzi B.[6]
6-06-2
Kecmanovic M.[3]
Cid R.
6-06-3
R32
Lestienne C.
Norrie C.[8]
6-47-5
Wong C.
Harris B.
6-36-746-4
Bonzi B.[6]
Pacheco Mendez R.
2-66-26-2
Dzumhur D.
Boyer T.
3-66-46-2
Cid R.
Shimabukuro S.
7-56-3
Mensik J.[5]
Garin C.
6-36-4
Mejia N.
Seyboth Wild T.
4-66-36-2
Mccabe J.
Virtanen O.
7-656-0
Sakamoto R.
Nanda G.
6-36-4
Fognini F.
Schoolkate T.
1-66-36-2
Kovacevic A.
Bellucci M.[7]
6-46-4
Altmaier D.
Lajovic D.
6-26-746-2