Jurij Rodionov vs Matteo Martineau — Cherbourg CH Quarter-final

Cherbourg CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Jurij Rodionov
AUT6
Jurij Rodionov
#143ATP
1636ELO
1584Hard ELO
$205kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
27 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 March 2025
hard
Matteo Martineau
FRA
Matteo Martineau
#333ATP
1417ELO
1398Hard ELO
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWWL
Rodionov J.
6-3 6-3
Martineau M.
Rodionov J.
662
Martineau M.
330

Jurij Rodionov defeated Matteo Martineau 6-3 6-3 in the Cherbourg CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Jurij Rodionov came in ranked #143.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rodionov J.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Martineau M.

Martineau M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Rodionov J.

Serve advantage — Rodionov J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rodionov J.Martineau M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.2
6.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (93 vs 83). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rodionov J.Martineau M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
40
9
Break points saved·Even
89
86
Break points won·Clear edge
17
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
45
3
Tiebreaks·Dominant
54
13

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rodionov J.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Martineau M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.1+186 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.9Hard Elo 1398
7.4Overall Elo 1636
ELO gap
2.6Overall Elo 1417
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
5.2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.7
Minutes 14d
7.1
0.0
3-set count
4.0
6.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Rodionov J.Martineau M.
Freshness·Clear edge
75
96

Rodionov J.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 32 games (7d) · Martineau M.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 17 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Herbert P.[1]
Sels J.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Herbert P.[1]
Rodionov J.[6]
6-46-2
Sels J.
Zahraj P.
6-36-726-3
Quarter-finals
Herbert P.[1]
Ruusuvuori E.
7-656-1
Sels J.
Shimizu Y.[4]
7-56-3
Zahraj P.
Fery A.
7-56-1
Rodionov J.[6]
Martineau M.
6-36-3
R16
Ruusuvuori E.
Onclin G.[7]
6-46-3
Martineau M.
De Schepper K.
7-624-67-65
Sels J.
Gobat A.
6-46-1
Zahraj P.
Malige M.
4-66-36-3
Fery A.
Vandermeersch C.
6-26-2
Shimizu Y.[4]
Janvier M.
6-27-66
Herbert P.[1]
Bouquier A.
6-33-66-3
Rodionov J.[6]
Massard L.
6-36-1
R32
Herbert P.[1]
Chidekh C.
2-66-36-3
Ruusuvuori E.
Prihodko O.
6-41-66-3
Martineau M.
Pokorny L.
4-66-47-5
Rodionov J.[6]
Paul J.
6-26-3
Sels J.
Escoffier A.[5]
6-46-4
Gobat A.
Jubb P.
6-36-4
Janvier M.
Sachko V.
6-32-66-3
Malige M.
Zhukayev B.[8]
6-32-66-4
Fery A.
Gerasimov E.
6-727-656-4
De Schepper K.
Durasovic V.
6-26-4
Massard L.
Gentzsch T.
6-43-66-4
Shimizu Y.[4]
Yevseyev D.
6-23-66-3
Vandermeersch C.
Kachmazov A.[2]
7-56-3
Zahraj P.
Vatutin A.
6-16-4
Bouquier A.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-736-46-2
Onclin G.[7]
Henning P.
6-16-3