Ignacio Buse vs Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva — Santiago CH Quarter-final

Santiago CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Ignacio Buse
PER
Ignacio Buse
#33ATP
1822ELO
1786Clay ELO
$949kYTD
$1.4MCAREER
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 March 2025
clay
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
BRA
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
#250ATP
1486ELO
1470Clay ELO
$76kYTD
$371kCAREER
26 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
Buse I.
6-2 6-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Buse I.
662
Reis Da Silva J.
220

Ignacio Buse defeated Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva 6-2 6-2 in the Santiago CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Ignacio Buse came in ranked #33, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Buse I.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Reis Da Silva J.

Reis Da Silva J.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Buse I.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Buse I.Reis Da Silva J.
41
Serve
—
8
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Buse I.Reis Da Silva J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.6
2.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (97 vs 102). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Buse I.Reis Da Silva J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
63
12
Break points saved·Dominant
87
49
Break points won·Clear edge
28
43
Deciding sets·Dominant
80
9
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Buse I.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Reis Da Silva J.
3.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
7.9+316 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.1Clay Elo 1470
8.1Overall Elo 1822
ELO gap
1.9Overall Elo 1486
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.7
Surface form
5.0
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
7.1
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Buse I.Reis Da Silva J.
Freshness·
98
—

Buse I.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Galan D.[2]
Monteiro T.[1]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Galan D.[2]
Nava E.
7-686-2
Monteiro T.[1]
Buse I.
7-57-64
Quarter-finals
Galan D.[2]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
7-647-64
Monteiro T.[1]
Olivieri G.
3-66-36-3
Nava E.
Collarini A.[8]
5-76-36-3
Buse I.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-26-2
R16
Monteiro T.[1]
Midon L.
7-57-5
Olivieri G.
Dellien Velasco M.[7]
6-32-67-5
Buse I.
Feldbausch K.
6-37-62
Collarini A.[8]
Mochizuki Y.
6-26-1
Nava E.
Bueno G.
1-66-16-3
Galan D.[2]
Sakamoto P.
6-36-4
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Olivo R.
6-726-26-1
Reis Da Silva J.
Barrios Vera T.[3]
6-36-1
R32
Nava E.
Ficovich J.[4]
6-06-4
Dellien Velasco M.[7]
Sell K.
6-26-4
Barrios Vera T.[3]
Dedura Palomero D.
3-66-27-5
Reis Da Silva J.
Soto M.
6-46-3
Feldbausch K.
Vallejo A.[5]
6-26-2
Collarini A.[8]
Guillen Meza A.
4-66-46-4
Bueno G.
Popko D.
6-36-4
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Varillas J.[6]
6-33-66-2
Sakamoto P.
Torrealba B.
6-06-2
Buse I.
Martin Tiffon P.
6-32-66-2
Galan D.[2]
Torres J.
6-46-4
Olivieri G.
Justo G.
6-26-736-5
Monteiro T.[1]
Alves M.
7-56-716-3
Midon L.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-27-5
Mochizuki Y.
Villalon N.
6-43-66-3
Olivo R.
Saraiva Dos Santos P.
6-33-67-65