Clement Tabur vs Maximilian Neuchrist — Kigali 2 CH Round of 32

Kigali 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Clement Tabur
FRA
Clement Tabur
#178ATP
1607ELO
1553Clay ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 March 2025
clay
Maximilian Neuchrist
AUT
Maximilian Neuchrist
#819ATP
34 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLWLWL
Tabur C.
7-6 6-4
Neuchrist M.
Tabur C.
7862
Neuchrist M.
6640

Clement Tabur defeated Maximilian Neuchrist 7-6 6-4 in the Kigali 2 CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Clement Tabur came in ranked #178, defending last year's final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tabur C.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Neuchrist M.

Neuchrist M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Serve advantage — Tabur C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tabur C.Neuchrist M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
54%
Service points won·Even
64%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
32%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
70%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.9
4.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (76 vs 30). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tabur C.Neuchrist M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
49
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
86
Break points won·Clear edge
23
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
40
69
Tiebreaks·Dominant
45
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tabur C.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Neuchrist M.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
4.9
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
2.0
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tabur C.Neuchrist M.
Freshness·Dominant
55
89

Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 100 games (7d) · Neuchrist M.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 17 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Royer V.[4]
Den Ouden G.
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Royer V.[4]
Houkes M.
7-676-2
Den Ouden G.
Pavlovic L.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Houkes M.
Tabur C.
6-27-65
Royer V.[4]
Pennaforti G.
6-37-65
Pavlovic L.
Cecchinato M.
7-636-746-4
Den Ouden G.
Hemery C.[2]
6-736-02-0
R16
Pennaforti G.
Neumayer L.[5]
7-56-4
Cecchinato M.
Michalski D.
6-46-1
Den Ouden G.
Ionel N.
7-56-1
Houkes M.
Marti Pujolras A.
5-76-46-3
Tabur C.
Blancaneaux G.[7]
7-616-3
Royer V.[4]
Agamenone F.
7-637-62
Hemery C.[2]
Denolly C.
6-36-4
Pavlovic L.
Erhard M.
6-46-4
R32
Marti Pujolras A.
De Jong J.[1]
7-53-2
Houkes M.
Sanchez Jover C.
6-36-1
Tabur C.
Neuchrist M.
7-666-4
Blancaneaux G.[7]
Picchione A.
6-36-4
Royer V.[4]
Roca Batalla O.
6-24-66-3
Agamenone F.
Martin A.
7-666-756-3
Pennaforti G.
Schwaerzler J.
6-46-2
Neumayer L.[5]
Chazal M.
6-26-4
Michalski D.
Jianu F.[8]
6-23-66-2
Cecchinato M.
Gakhov I.
7-57-65
Pavlovic L.
Taberner C.[3]
7-646-2
Den Ouden G.
Misolic F.
6-26-2
Hemery C.[2]
Erel Y.
6-37-64
Erhard M.
Janvier M.
6-36-2
Ionel N.
Tomic B.[6]
6-47-69
Denolly C.
Coulibaly E.
6-46-1