Guy Den Ouden vs Filip Misolic — Kigali 2 CH Round of 32

Kigali 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
NED
Guy Den Ouden
#231ATP
1495ELO
1484Clay ELO
$84kYTD
$332kCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 March 2025
clay
Filip Misolic
AUT
Filip Misolic
#293ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
Den Ouden G.
6-2 6-2
Misolic F.
Den Ouden G.
662
Misolic F.
220

Guy Den Ouden defeated Filip Misolic 6-2 6-2 in the Kigali 2 CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Filip Misolic came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Guy Den Ouden claimed a first win over Filip Misolic in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-06-30WimbledonQ1grassFilip Misolic3-6 6-1 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Den Ouden G.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Misolic F.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Den Ouden G.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Den Ouden G.Misolic F.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
43%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.4
3.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (66 vs 84). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Den Ouden G.Misolic F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
26
79
Break points saved·Clear edge
72
91
Break points won·Clear edge
36
53
Deciding sets·Dominant
20
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
35
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Den Ouden G.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Misolic F.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.6Clay Elo 1484
Surface ELO
7.4+180 Clay Elo edge
3.4Overall Elo 1495
ELO gap
6.6Overall Elo 1587
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.2
Surface form
5.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.4
Minutes 14d
7.0
7.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Den Ouden G.Misolic F.
Freshness·
80
—

Den Ouden G.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 59 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Royer V.[4]
Den Ouden G.
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Royer V.[4]
Houkes M.
7-676-2
Den Ouden G.
Pavlovic L.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Houkes M.
Tabur C.
6-27-65
Royer V.[4]
Pennaforti G.
6-37-65
Pavlovic L.
Cecchinato M.
7-636-746-4
Den Ouden G.
Hemery C.[2]
6-736-02-0
R16
Pennaforti G.
Neumayer L.[5]
7-56-4
Cecchinato M.
Michalski D.
6-46-1
Den Ouden G.
Ionel N.
7-56-1
Houkes M.
Marti Pujolras A.
5-76-46-3
Tabur C.
Blancaneaux G.[7]
7-616-3
Royer V.[4]
Agamenone F.
7-637-62
Hemery C.[2]
Denolly C.
6-36-4
Pavlovic L.
Erhard M.
6-46-4
R32
Marti Pujolras A.
De Jong J.[1]
7-53-2
Houkes M.
Sanchez Jover C.
6-36-1
Tabur C.
Neuchrist M.
7-666-4
Blancaneaux G.[7]
Picchione A.
6-36-4
Royer V.[4]
Roca Batalla O.
6-24-66-3
Agamenone F.
Martin A.
7-666-756-3
Pennaforti G.
Schwaerzler J.
6-46-2
Neumayer L.[5]
Chazal M.
6-26-4
Michalski D.
Jianu F.[8]
6-23-66-2
Cecchinato M.
Gakhov I.
7-57-65
Pavlovic L.
Taberner C.[3]
7-646-2
Den Ouden G.
Misolic F.
6-26-2
Hemery C.[2]
Erel Y.
6-37-64
Erhard M.
Janvier M.
6-36-2
Ionel N.
Tomic B.[6]
6-47-69
Denolly C.
Coulibaly E.
6-46-1