Borna Coric vs Emil Ruusuvuori — Thionville CH Round of 16

Thionville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CRO1
Borna Coric
#855ATP
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 3 March 2025
hard
FIN
Emil Ruusuvuori
#787ATP
1606ELO
1577Hard ELO
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
Coric B.
6-2 2-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Coric B.
62–
Ruusuvuori E.
22–

Borna Coric advanced when Emil Ruusuvuori retired 6-2 2-2 in the Thionville CH round of 16. Borna Coric extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-07-29WashingtonR64hardEmil Ruusuvuori6-7(4) 7-6(8) 6-4
2021-02-01Murray River OpenR32hardBorna Coric7-5 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Coric B.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Ruusuvuori E.

Ruusuvuori E.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Coric B.

Serve advantage — Coric B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Coric B.Ruusuvuori E.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
55%
47%
Service points won·Even
66%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.2
7.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.8
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (37 vs 24). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Coric B.Ruusuvuori E.
Clutch Rating·Even
71
72
Break points saved·Even
98
97
Break points won·Clear edge
36
48
Deciding sets·Even
84
80
Tiebreaks·Even
90
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Coric B.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ruusuvuori E.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
6.9
Surface form
3.9
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
8.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Coric B.[1]
Bouquier A.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Coric B.[1]
Kachmazov A.[7]
4-66-46-3
Bouquier A.
Rodionov J.
6-727-657-65
Quarter-finals
Bouquier A.
Van Assche L.
W/O
Kachmazov A.[7]
Draxl L.[4]
7-665-76-2
Rodionov J.
Choinski J.[8]
6-26-4
Coric B.[1]
Dougaz A.
6-46-2
R16
Draxl L.[4]
Zhukayev B.
6-33-66-3
Kachmazov A.[7]
Hassan B.
6-34-67-5
Bouquier A.
Droguet T.[6]
6-46-3
Rodionov J.
Paul J.
6-36-1
Choinski J.[8]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-36-1
Van Assche L.[3]
Martineau M.
6-13-66-3
Coric B.[1]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-22-2
Dougaz A.
Paris T.
6-36-4
R32
Rodionov J.
Sachko V.
6-26-2
Paris T.
Escoffier A.
2-67-656-4
Draxl L.[4]
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-46-7106-4
Zhukayev B.
Rehberg M.
7-646-1
Droguet T.[6]
Squire H.
4-66-46-2
Bouquier A.
Broska F.
6-36-4
Martineau M.
Added D.
6-757-636-3
Van Assche L.[3]
Grenier H.
6-46-4
Paul J.
Blockx A.[2]
6-17-65
Kachmazov A.[7]
Onclin G.
6-26-3
Choinski J.[8]
Henning P.
6-46-3
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Yevseyev D.
6-42-66-4
Hassan B.
Balshaw F.
6-46-3
Ruusuvuori E.
Bobichon M.
6-46-4
Coric B.[1]
Jubb P.
6-26-1
Dougaz A.
Shimizu Y.[5]
6-46-3