Marco Cecchinato vs Daniel Michalski — Kigali 2 CH Round of 16

Kigali 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Marco Cecchinato
ITA
Marco Cecchinato
#175ATP
1576ELO
1546Clay ELO
$149kYTD
$5.3MCAREER
33 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 March 2025
clay
Daniel Michalski
POL
Daniel Michalski
#299ATP
1435ELO
1386Clay ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLL
Cecchinato M.
6-4 6-1
Michalski D.
Cecchinato M.
662
Michalski D.
410

Marco Cecchinato defeated Daniel Michalski 6-4 6-1 in the Kigali 2 CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cecchinato M.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Michalski D.

Michalski D.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Cecchinato M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cecchinato M.Michalski D.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
52%
Aces / match·Even
2.6
2.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (105 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cecchinato M.Michalski D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
42
26
Break points saved·Dominant
89
24
Break points won·Slight edge
20
26
Deciding sets·Dominant
36
64
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
79
62

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cecchinato M.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Michalski D.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.4+160 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.6Clay Elo 1386
6.9Overall Elo 1576
ELO gap
3.1Overall Elo 1435
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
5.9
Surface form
4.4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.9
Minutes 14d
7.7
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cecchinato M.Michalski D.
Freshness·Even
69
73

Cecchinato M.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 37 games (7d) · Michalski D.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 67 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Royer V.[4]
Den Ouden G.
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Royer V.[4]
Houkes M.
7-676-2
Den Ouden G.
Pavlovic L.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Houkes M.
Tabur C.
6-27-65
Royer V.[4]
Pennaforti G.
6-37-65
Pavlovic L.
Cecchinato M.
7-636-746-4
Den Ouden G.
Hemery C.[2]
6-736-02-0
R16
Pennaforti G.
Neumayer L.[5]
7-56-4
Cecchinato M.
Michalski D.
6-46-1
Den Ouden G.
Ionel N.
7-56-1
Houkes M.
Marti Pujolras A.
5-76-46-3
Tabur C.
Blancaneaux G.[7]
7-616-3
Royer V.[4]
Agamenone F.
7-637-62
Hemery C.[2]
Denolly C.
6-36-4
Pavlovic L.
Erhard M.
6-46-4
R32
Marti Pujolras A.
De Jong J.[1]
7-53-2
Houkes M.
Sanchez Jover C.
6-36-1
Tabur C.
Neuchrist M.
7-666-4
Blancaneaux G.[7]
Picchione A.
6-36-4
Royer V.[4]
Roca Batalla O.
6-24-66-3
Agamenone F.
Martin A.
7-666-756-3
Pennaforti G.
Schwaerzler J.
6-46-2
Neumayer L.[5]
Chazal M.
6-26-4
Michalski D.
Jianu F.[8]
6-23-66-2
Cecchinato M.
Gakhov I.
7-57-65
Pavlovic L.
Taberner C.[3]
7-646-2
Den Ouden G.
Misolic F.
6-26-2
Hemery C.[2]
Erel Y.
6-37-64
Erhard M.
Janvier M.
6-36-2
Ionel N.
Tomic B.[6]
6-47-69
Denolly C.
Coulibaly E.
6-46-1