Guy Den Ouden vs Clement Tabur — Kigali 1 CH Round of 32

Kigali 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
NED
Guy Den Ouden
#231ATP
1495ELO
1484Clay ELO
$84kYTD
$332kCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2025
clay
Clement Tabur
FRA
Clement Tabur
#178ATP
1607ELO
1553Clay ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLLWWLWL
Den Ouden G.
7-6 6-4
Tabur C.
Den Ouden G.
7762
Tabur C.
6340

Guy Den Ouden defeated Clement Tabur 7-6 6-4 in the Kigali 1 CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Clement Tabur came in ranked #178, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Den Ouden G.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Tabur C.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Den Ouden G.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Den Ouden G.Tabur C.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
43%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.4
4.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (66 vs 76). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Den Ouden G.Tabur C.
Clutch Rating·Even
26
30
Break points saved·Even
72
74
Break points won·Clear edge
36
23
Deciding sets·Clear edge
19
33
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
35
45

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Den Ouden G.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Tabur C.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
4.2Clay Elo 1484
Surface ELO
5.8+69 Clay Elo edge
3.2Overall Elo 1495
ELO gap
6.8Overall Elo 1607
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
5.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
8.1
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Den Ouden G.Tabur C.
Freshness·Slight edge
77
69

Den Ouden G.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 59 games (7d) · Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 68 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Royer V.[3]
Martin A.
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Martin A.
Neuchrist M.
3-66-47-65
Royer V.[3]
Cecchinato M.
7-53-66-1
Quarter-finals
Martin A.
Erhard M.
6-26-4
Cecchinato M.
Neumayer L.[5]
6-36-777-5
Neuchrist M.
Houkes M.
6-45-77-65
Royer V.[3]
Jianu F.[6]
6-747-647-63
R16
Houkes M.
Coulibaly E.
7-666-3
Martin A.
Marti Pujolras A.
6-25-76-3
Neuchrist M.
Schwaerzler J.
4-67-656-1
Jianu F.[6]
Oberleitner N.
7-656-3
Neumayer L.[5]
Sanchez Jover C.
6-43-67-5
Cecchinato M.
Taberner C.[2]
7-667-5
Royer V.[3]
Den Ouden G.
4-66-17-64
Erhard M.
Pavlovic L.
6-737-623-0
R32
Pavlovic L.
Roca Batalla O.[7]
6-26-4
Martin A.
De Jong J.[1]
7-616-3
Erhard M.
Jones M.
6-37-5
Schwaerzler J.
Kolar Z.
6-46-4
Coulibaly E.
Michalski D.
6-46-4
Jianu F.[6]
Ionel N.
6-46-4
Den Ouden G.
Tabur C.
7-636-4
Neumayer L.[5]
Pennaforti G.
4-66-26-4
Sanchez Jover C.
Denolly C.
6-36-3
Cecchinato M.
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-4
Neuchrist M.
Hemery C.[4]
6-42-0
Oberleitner N.
Guinard M.
7-52-0
Royer V.[3]
Chazal M.
6-36-4
Houkes M.
Janvier M.
6-36-4
Marti Pujolras A.
Kellovsky D.
7-6116-2
Taberner C.[2]
Picchione A.
6-26-2