Tomas Machac vs Learner Tien — Acapulco Quarter-final

Acapulco · ATP · Quarter-final
Tomas Machac
CZE8
Tomas Machac
#49ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2025
hard
Learner Tien
USA
Learner Tien
#17ATP
1941ELO
1904Hard ELO
$1.3MYTD
$4.4MCAREER
20 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Machac T.
6-3 7-5
Tien L.
Machac T.
672
Tien L.
350

Tomas Machac defeated Learner Tien 6-3 7-5 in the Acapulco quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Learner Tien came in ranked #17. Tomas Machac extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Tomas Machac closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-05-07Rome MastersR64clayTomas Machac6-4 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Tien L.

Tien L.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Machac T.Tien L.
30
Serve
32
25
Return
67

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Tien L.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.1
5.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (56 vs 85). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Tien L.
Clutch Rating·Even
90
90
Break points saved·Even
98
97
Break points won·Even
80
83
Deciding sets·Slight edge
94
100
Tiebreaks·Even
97
100

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Machac T.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Tien L.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.2Hard Elo 1829
Surface ELO
5.8+75 Hard Elo edge
4.3Overall Elo 1866
ELO gap
5.7Overall Elo 1941
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
7.1
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.5
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Machac T.Tien L.
Freshness·
—
89

Tien L.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
30°COvercast
Wind 14 km/hHumidity 67%
Final
Machac T.[8]
Davidovich Fokina A.
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Davidovich Fokina A.
Shapovalov D.[9]
7-637-61
Machac T.[8]
Nakashima B.
6-41-66-4
Quarter-finals
Davidovich Fokina A.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-26-2
Machac T.[8]
Tien L.
6-37-5
Nakashima B.
Goffin D.
7-646-2
Shapovalov D.[9]
Giron M.
4-66-36-2
R16
Tien L.
Zverev A.[1]
6-36-4
Giron M.
Paul T.[3]
W/O
Pacheco Mendez R.
Ruud C.[2]
W/O
Nakashima B.
Rune H.[4]
3-0
Shapovalov D.[9]
Michelsen A.
6-46-3
Machac T.[8]
Altmaier D.
7-636-1
Goffin D.
Shelton B.[5]
7-636-3
Davidovich Fokina A.
Tiafoe F.[7]
6-36-766-3
R32
Shelton B.[5]
Cobolli F.
7-647-64
Nakashima B.
Bonzi B.
7-667-5
Ruud C.[2]
Rinderknech A.
6-46-3
Tien L.
Norrie C.
7-656-3
Paul T.[3]
Diallo G.
6-26-2
Altmaier D.
Kecmanovic M.
4-66-46-3
Davidovich Fokina A.
Bellucci M.
1-67-666-2
Tiafoe F.[7]
Muller A.
6-46-2
Pacheco Mendez R.
Vukic A.
7-54-67-64
Rune H.[4]
Carballes Baena R.
7-646-3
Zverev A.[1]
Arnaldi M.
6-726-36-4
Giron M.
Walton A.
7-646-2
Goffin D.
Hijikata R.
6-26-3
Shapovalov D.[9]
Basavareddy N.
7-56-2
Michelsen A.
Yunchaokete B.
2-67-657-65
Machac T.[8]
Mensik J.
6-42-66-3