Tomas Machac vs Jakub Mensik — Acapulco Round of 32

Acapulco · ATP · Round of 32
Tomas Machac
CZE8
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2025
hard
Jakub Mensik
CZE
Jakub Mensik
#19ATP
1931ELO
1893Hard ELO
$2.0MYTD
$6.9MCAREER
20 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWWL
Machac T.
6-4 2-6 6-3
Mensik J.
Machac T.
6262
Mensik J.
4631

Tomas Machac defeated Jakub Mensik 6-4 2-6 6-3 in the Acapulco round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jakub Mensik came in ranked #19.

Key context

  • Match story: Tomas Machac closed it out in three sets, 6–4 2–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Mensik J.

Mensik J.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Machac T.Mensik J.
30
Serve
42
25
Return
51

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Mensik J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
67%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.1
12.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (56 vs 75). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Mensik J.
Clutch Rating·Even
90
88
Break points saved·Even
98
98
Break points won·Even
80
77
Deciding sets·Even
94
92
Tiebreaks·Even
97
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Machac T.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Mensik J.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.1Hard Elo 1829
Surface ELO
5.9+64 Hard Elo edge
3.9Overall Elo 1866
ELO gap
6.1Overall Elo 1931
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
6.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Machac T.Mensik J.
Freshness·
—
90

Mensik J.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
30°COvercast
Wind 14 km/hHumidity 67%
Final
Machac T.[8]
Davidovich Fokina A.
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Davidovich Fokina A.
Shapovalov D.[9]
7-637-61
Machac T.[8]
Nakashima B.
6-41-66-4
Quarter-finals
Davidovich Fokina A.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-26-2
Machac T.[8]
Tien L.
6-37-5
Nakashima B.
Goffin D.
7-646-2
Shapovalov D.[9]
Giron M.
4-66-36-2
R16
Tien L.
Zverev A.[1]
6-36-4
Giron M.
Paul T.[3]
W/O
Pacheco Mendez R.
Ruud C.[2]
W/O
Nakashima B.
Rune H.[4]
3-0
Shapovalov D.[9]
Michelsen A.
6-46-3
Machac T.[8]
Altmaier D.
7-636-1
Goffin D.
Shelton B.[5]
7-636-3
Davidovich Fokina A.
Tiafoe F.[7]
6-36-766-3
R32
Shelton B.[5]
Cobolli F.
7-647-64
Nakashima B.
Bonzi B.
7-667-5
Ruud C.[2]
Rinderknech A.
6-46-3
Tien L.
Norrie C.
7-656-3
Paul T.[3]
Diallo G.
6-26-2
Altmaier D.
Kecmanovic M.
4-66-46-3
Davidovich Fokina A.
Bellucci M.
1-67-666-2
Tiafoe F.[7]
Muller A.
6-46-2
Pacheco Mendez R.
Vukic A.
7-54-67-64
Rune H.[4]
Carballes Baena R.
7-646-3
Zverev A.[1]
Arnaldi M.
6-726-36-4
Giron M.
Walton A.
7-646-2
Goffin D.
Hijikata R.
6-26-3
Shapovalov D.[9]
Basavareddy N.
7-56-2
Michelsen A.
Yunchaokete B.
2-67-657-65
Machac T.[8]
Mensik J.
6-42-66-3