Ena Shibahara vs Kaja Juvan — Austin Round of 32

Austin · WTA · Round of 32
Ena Shibahara
JPN
Ena Shibahara
#404WTA
1464ELO
1438Hard ELO
28 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2025
hard
Kaja Juvan
SLO
Kaja Juvan
#127WTA
1696ELO
1637Hard ELO
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLW
Shibahara E.
2-6 6-3 6-2
Juvan K.
Shibahara E.
2662
Juvan K.
6321

Ena Shibahara defeated Kaja Juvan 2-6 6-3 6-2 in the Austin round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Kaja Juvan came in ranked #127.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Shibahara E.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Juvan K.

Juvan K.serving80% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Shibahara E.

Serve advantage — Juvan K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Shibahara E.Juvan K.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
41%
45%
Break points saved·Even
55%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.1
2.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.5
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (60 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Shibahara E.Juvan K.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
47
58
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
56
Break points won·Dominant
65
95
Deciding sets·Dominant
36
83
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
33

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shibahara E.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Juvan K.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.4Hard Elo 1438
Surface ELO
7.6+199 Hard Elo edge
1.8Overall Elo 1464
ELO gap
8.2Overall Elo 1696
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
4.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Pegula J.[1]
Kessler M.[5]
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Pegula J.[1]
Tomljanovic A.
6-14-66-3
Kessler M.[5]
Minnen G.
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Pegula J.[1]
Blinkova A.
6-26-2
Tomljanovic A.
Shibahara E.
7-53-67-68
Minnen G.
Dolehide C.
6-37-5
Kessler M.[5]
Cirstea S.
5-76-46-1
R16
Tomljanovic A.
Burrage J.
4-66-36-0
Minnen G.
Lamens S.[8]
6-16-0
Cirstea S.
Shnaider D.[2]
6-32-66-4
Dolehide C.
Gracheva V.
5-76-26-2
Shibahara E.
Birrell K.
6-34-66-4
Pegula J.[1]
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-16-3
Kessler M.[5]
Bucsa C.
5-76-37-64
Blinkova A.
Maria T.
6-26-2
R32
Pegula J.[1]
Rus A.
6-33-2
Gracheva V.
Stearns P.[3]
6-26-3
Shnaider D.[2]
Prozorova T.
0-66-27-5
Birrell K.
Yuan Y.[4]
7-657-65
Cirstea S.
Siegemund L.
6-30-66-1
Parrizas Diaz N.
Rapolu M.
6-26-4
Dolehide C.
Zakharova A.
6-25-76-4
Maria T.
Bondar A.
6-44-66-1
Shibahara E.
Juvan K.
2-66-36-2
Tomljanovic A.
Volynets K.[7]
7-637-5
Minnen G.
Wei S.
5-76-36-2
Burrage J.
Kvitova P.
3-66-46-4
Blinkova A.
Uchijima M.[6]
4-66-46-0
Lamens S.[8]
Rakhimova K.
1-66-36-4
Bucsa C.
Pera B.
6-36-4
Kessler M.[5]
Golubic V.
6-27-5