James Mccabe vs Kyrian Jacquet — Bengaluru CH Round of 32

Bengaluru CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
James Mccabe
#207ATP
1532ELO
1481Hard ELO
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2025
hard
Kyrian Jacquet
FRA5
Kyrian Jacquet
#139ATP
1685ELO
1663Hard ELO
$264kYTD
$1.0MCAREER
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWL
Mccabe J.
6-7 6-1 6-2
Jacquet K.
Mccabe J.
68662
Jacquet K.
710121

James Mccabe defeated Kyrian Jacquet 6-7 6-1 6-2 in the Bengaluru CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Kyrian Jacquet came in ranked #139.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mccabe J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Jacquet K.

Jacquet K.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Mccabe J.

Serve advantage — Jacquet K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mccabe J.Jacquet K.
1st serve in·Even
61%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
41%
Break points saved·Even
61%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.4
5.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (90 vs 76). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mccabe J.Jacquet K.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
37
47
Break points saved·Even
85
87
Break points won·Clear edge
9
27
Deciding sets·Dominant
71
40
Tiebreaks·Dominant
12
90

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mccabe J.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Jacquet K.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.7Hard Elo 1481
Surface ELO
7.3+182 Hard Elo edge
3.0Overall Elo 1532
ELO gap
7.0Overall Elo 1685
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
8.5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.3
Minutes 14d
4.2
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mccabe J.Jacquet K.
Freshness·Even
91
91

Mccabe J.: 3 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d) · Jacquet K.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Holt B.[3]
Mochizuki S.[7]
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Holt B.[3]
Harris B.
6-27-64
Mochizuki S.[7]
Mccabe J.
6-13-66-4
Quarter-finals
Mochizuki S.[7]
Barton H.
7-656-3
Mccabe J.
Mejia N.
4-66-46-3
Holt B.[3]
Bar Biryukov P.
6-46-4
Harris B.
Schoolkate T.[2]
6-21-67-5
R16
Barton H.
Holmgren A.
7-656-3
Mccabe J.
Noguchi R.
7-55-77-65
Harris B.
Gengel M.
6-46-3
Holt B.[3]
Tomic B.
5-76-46-4
Mochizuki S.[7]
Clarke J.
5-76-16-2
Mejia N.
Ellis B.
6-17-5
Schoolkate T.[2]
Rodionov J.
6-33-66-2
Bar Biryukov P.
Alvarez Varona N.
6-47-65
R32
Schoolkate T.[2]
Sultanov K.
7-56-756-3
Mccabe J.
Jacquet K.[5]
6-786-16-2
Harris B.
Couacaud E.
6-11-0
Barton H.
Kopriva V.[1]
4-66-46-3
Clarke J.
Samrej K.
6-16-0
Mochizuki S.[7]
Ramanathan R.
7-637-5
Mejia N.
Moller E.[4]
6-36-4
Ellis B.
Geerts M.
6-726-47-66
Noguchi R.
Engel J.
7-56-2
Tomic B.
Simakin I.
3-67-646-4
Holt B.[3]
Vacherot V.
6-46-4
Alvarez Varona N.
Blanchet U.[6]
6-34-2
Rodionov J.
Singh K.
6-44-67-63
Holmgren A.
Dalla Valle E.
6-46-4
Gengel M.
Dev S.
6-726-36-3
Bar Biryukov P.
Dhamne M.
6-33-67-63