Brandon Holt vs Bernard Tomic — Bengaluru CH Round of 16

Bengaluru CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA3
Brandon Holt
#558ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2025
hard
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#204ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
Holt B.
5-7 6-4 6-4
Tomic B.
Holt B.
5662
Tomic B.
7441

Brandon Holt defeated Bernard Tomic 5-7 6-4 6-4 in the Bengaluru CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Bernard Tomic came in ranked #204, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Holt B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Tomic B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Holt B.Tomic B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
64%
Aces / match·Even
5.5
5.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
0.9
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (75 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Holt B.Tomic B.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
58
53
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
92
Break points won·Dominant
31
4
Deciding sets·Slight edge
79
74
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
69
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holt B.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Tomic B.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.5+66 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Hard Elo 1441
5.3Overall Elo 1537
ELO gap
4.7Overall Elo 1475
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.6
Surface form
4.1
Fatigue & Travel
0.0
Minutes 14d
8.3
0.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Holt B.Tomic B.
Freshness·
—
75

Tomic B.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Holt B.[3]
Mochizuki S.[7]
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Holt B.[3]
Harris B.
6-27-64
Mochizuki S.[7]
Mccabe J.
6-13-66-4
Quarter-finals
Mochizuki S.[7]
Barton H.
7-656-3
Mccabe J.
Mejia N.
4-66-46-3
Holt B.[3]
Bar Biryukov P.
6-46-4
Harris B.
Schoolkate T.[2]
6-21-67-5
R16
Barton H.
Holmgren A.
7-656-3
Mccabe J.
Noguchi R.
7-55-77-65
Harris B.
Gengel M.
6-46-3
Holt B.[3]
Tomic B.
5-76-46-4
Mochizuki S.[7]
Clarke J.
5-76-16-2
Mejia N.
Ellis B.
6-17-5
Schoolkate T.[2]
Rodionov J.
6-33-66-2
Bar Biryukov P.
Alvarez Varona N.
6-47-65
R32
Schoolkate T.[2]
Sultanov K.
7-56-756-3
Mccabe J.
Jacquet K.[5]
6-786-16-2
Harris B.
Couacaud E.
6-11-0
Barton H.
Kopriva V.[1]
4-66-46-3
Clarke J.
Samrej K.
6-16-0
Mochizuki S.[7]
Ramanathan R.
7-637-5
Mejia N.
Moller E.[4]
6-36-4
Ellis B.
Geerts M.
6-726-47-66
Noguchi R.
Engel J.
7-56-2
Tomic B.
Simakin I.
3-67-646-4
Holt B.[3]
Vacherot V.
6-46-4
Alvarez Varona N.
Blanchet U.[6]
6-34-2
Rodionov J.
Singh K.
6-44-67-63
Holmgren A.
Dalla Valle E.
6-46-4
Gengel M.
Dev S.
6-726-36-3
Bar Biryukov P.
Dhamne M.
6-33-67-63