Tatjana Maria vs Anna Bondar — Austin Round of 32

Austin · WTA · Round of 32
Tatjana Maria
GER
Tatjana Maria
#96WTA
1703ELO
1608Hard ELO
38 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2025
hard
Anna Bondar
HUN
Anna Bondar
#74WTA
1735ELO
1654Hard ELO
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLWWL
Maria T.
6-4 4-6 6-1
Bondar A.
Maria T.
6462
Bondar A.
4611

Tatjana Maria defeated Anna Bondar 6-4 4-6 6-1 in the Austin round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Anna Bondar came in ranked #74. Tatjana Maria extended the head-to-head to 4–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Tatjana Maria came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–4 4–6 6–1.

Head to head

3–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-01-12HobartR16hardAnna Bondar7-6(7) 7-5
2025-08-18MonterreyR32hardTatjana Maria7-6(5) 7-5
2024-04-01BogotaR32clayTatjana Maria6-3 6-2
2023-05-08RomeR128clayAnna Bondar6-4 6-1
2022-08-22GranbyR16hardTatjana Maria6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Maria T.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Bondar A.

Bondar A.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Maria T.

Serve advantage — Bondar A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Maria T.Bondar A.
9
Serve
32
13
Return
27

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Maria T.Bondar A.
1st serve in·Even
58%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
48%
Service points won·Even
57%
59%
Return points won·Even
41%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
51%
60%
Aces / match·Even
4.0
4.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.2
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (77 vs 85). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Maria T.Bondar A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
13
51
Break points saved·Dominant
31
88
Break points won·Even
78
77
Deciding sets·Clear edge
9
27
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
58
78

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Maria T.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Bondar A.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.7Hard Elo 1608
Surface ELO
6.3+46 Hard Elo edge
3.1Overall Elo 1703
ELO gap
6.9Overall Elo 1735
10.0
H2H
0.0
5.6
Surface form
4.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Maria T.Bondar A.
Freshness·Dominant
69
96

Maria T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 63 games (7d) · Bondar A.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Pegula J.[1]
Kessler M.[5]
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Pegula J.[1]
Tomljanovic A.
6-14-66-3
Kessler M.[5]
Minnen G.
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Pegula J.[1]
Blinkova A.
6-26-2
Tomljanovic A.
Shibahara E.
7-53-67-68
Minnen G.
Dolehide C.
6-37-5
Kessler M.[5]
Cirstea S.
5-76-46-1
R16
Tomljanovic A.
Burrage J.
4-66-36-0
Minnen G.
Lamens S.[8]
6-16-0
Cirstea S.
Shnaider D.[2]
6-32-66-4
Dolehide C.
Gracheva V.
5-76-26-2
Shibahara E.
Birrell K.
6-34-66-4
Pegula J.[1]
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-16-3
Kessler M.[5]
Bucsa C.
5-76-37-64
Blinkova A.
Maria T.
6-26-2
R32
Pegula J.[1]
Rus A.
6-33-2
Gracheva V.
Stearns P.[3]
6-26-3
Shnaider D.[2]
Prozorova T.
0-66-27-5
Birrell K.
Yuan Y.[4]
7-657-65
Cirstea S.
Siegemund L.
6-30-66-1
Parrizas Diaz N.
Rapolu M.
6-26-4
Dolehide C.
Zakharova A.
6-25-76-4
Maria T.
Bondar A.
6-44-66-1
Shibahara E.
Juvan K.
2-66-36-2
Tomljanovic A.
Volynets K.[7]
7-637-5
Minnen G.
Wei S.
5-76-36-2
Burrage J.
Kvitova P.
3-66-46-4
Blinkova A.
Uchijima M.[6]
4-66-46-0
Lamens S.[8]
Rakhimova K.
1-66-36-4
Bucsa C.
Pera B.
6-36-4
Kessler M.[5]
Golubic V.
6-27-5