Chun Hsin Tseng vs Alejandro Tabilo — Rio de Janeiro Round of 32

Rio de Janeiro · ATP · Round of 32
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1541Clay ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 February 2025
clay
Alejandro Tabilo
CHI3
Alejandro Tabilo
#31ATP
1819ELO
1781Clay ELO
$1.1MYTD
$5.8MCAREER
29 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWL
Tseng C.
6-2 7-5
Tabilo A.
Tseng C.
672
Tabilo A.
250

Chun Hsin Tseng defeated Alejandro Tabilo 6-2 7-5 in the Rio de Janeiro round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Alejandro Tabilo came in ranked #31, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tseng C.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Tabilo A.

Tabilo A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Tseng C.Tabilo A.
—
Serve
83
—
Return
33

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tseng C.Tabilo A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.9
6.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 86). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tseng C.Tabilo A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
26
74
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
97
Break points won·Dominant
15
59
Deciding sets·Dominant
31
91
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
56

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tseng C.
3.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Tabilo A.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
1.6Clay Elo 1541
Surface ELO
8.4+240 Clay Elo edge
1.0Overall Elo 1554
ELO gap
9.0Overall Elo 1819
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
3.8
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
8.7
7.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tseng C.Tabilo A.
Freshness·Even
100
97

Tseng C.: 21 days rest · Tabilo A.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
39°CClear
Wind 7 km/hHumidity 22%
Final
Baez S.[5]
Muller A.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Baez S.[5]
Ugo Carabelli C.
3-66-16-1
Muller A.
Comesana F.
7-56-736-3
Quarter-finals
Comesana F.
Zverev A.[1]
4-66-36-4
Baez S.[5]
Tseng C.
6-46-1
Muller A.
Cerundolo F.[4]
7-56-1
Ugo Carabelli C.
Faria J.
7-656-4
R16
Comesana F.
Jarry N.[6]
7-646-717-66
Zverev A.[1]
Shevchenko A.
7-617-66
Ugo Carabelli C.
Dzumhur D.
6-46-4
Baez S.[5]
Navone M.
6-41-66-3
Cerundolo F.[4]
Darderi L.
6-716-36-2
Faria J.
Munar J.
6-42-66-3
Muller A.
Etcheverry T.[8]
7-57-65
Tseng C.
Monteiro T.
6-746-37-64
R32
Darderi L.
Dellien H.
7-622-2
Cerundolo F.[4]
Gaston H.
7-696-0
Ugo Carabelli C.
Martinez P.[7]
4-66-36-3
Dzumhur D.
Lajovic D.
6-36-4
Muller A.
Fonseca J.
6-17-64
Jarry N.[6]
Cerundolo J.
4-66-36-4
Baez S.[5]
Burruchaga R.
6-37-5
Navone M.
Carballes Baena R.
6-46-3
Tseng C.
Tabilo A.[3]
6-27-5
Etcheverry T.[8]
Moutet C.
6-37-61
Munar J.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-43-66-0
Monteiro T.
Diaz Acosta F.
3-66-37-63
Zverev A.[1]
Yunchaokete B.
7-646-4
Comesana F.
Heide G.
7-626-776-3
Faria J.
Barrios Vera T.
6-27-5
Shevchenko A.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-46-2