Brandon Holt vs Aryan Shah — Pune CH Round of 32

Pune CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA6
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 February 2025
hard
IND
Aryan Shah
#611ATP
1235ELO
1228Hard ELO
20 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLWLW
Holt B.
6-2 6-2
Shah A.
Holt B.
662
Shah A.
220

Brandon Holt defeated Aryan Shah 6-2 6-2 in the Pune CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Holt B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Shah A.

Shah A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Holt B.Shah A.
1st serve in·Clear edge
68%
54%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.5
4.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
0.9
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (75 vs 35). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holt B.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Shah A.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
8.5+279 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.5Hard Elo 1228
8.8Overall Elo 1537
ELO gap
1.2Overall Elo 1235
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
0.6
Minutes 14d
8.2
0.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Svrcina D.
Holt B.[6]
7-636-1
Semi-finals
Svrcina D.
Sultanov K.
6-786-03-1
Holt B.[6]
Galarneau A.[8]
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Holt B.[6]
Harris B.[1]
4-66-36-4
Svrcina D.
Simakin I.
6-16-3
Sultanov K.
Blanchet U.[5]
6-06-2
Galarneau A.[8]
Vacherot V.
3-66-37-63
R16
Galarneau A.[8]
Geerts M.
6-46-4
Blanchet U.[5]
Jacquet K.
2-66-36-1
Sultanov K.
Tomic B.
4-66-36-3
Simakin I.
Mccabe J.
6-26-4
Svrcina D.
Rodionov J.
6-47-5
Holt B.[6]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-46-4
Harris B.[1]
Moriya H.
7-56-3
Vacherot V.
Imamura M.
6-26-3
R32
Svrcina D.
Holmgren A.
4-66-37-5
Harris B.[1]
Dhamne M.
6-46-4
Moriya H.
Coppejans K.
7-657-5
Holt B.[6]
Shah A.
6-26-2
Imamura M.
Clarke J.
7-626-2
Blanchet U.[5]
Couacaud E.
3-66-26-3
Tomic B.
Mejia N.
6-26-2
Simakin I.
Ellis B.
6-46-2
Vacherot V.
Moller E.[4]
5-76-26-4
Rodionov J.
Mochizuki S.[7]
6-756-16-2
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Bar Biryukov P.
7-665-76-3
Mccabe J.
Dalla Valle E.
6-06-3
Sultanov K.
Schoolkate T.[3]
6-34-66-3
Galarneau A.[8]
Singh K.
6-46-1
Geerts M.
Gengel M.
4-66-17-64
Jacquet K.
Noguchi R.
6-16-3