Christopher Oconnell vs Hady Habib — Doha Round of 32

Doha · ATP · Round of 32
AUS
Christopher Oconnell
1673ELO
1657Hard ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 February 2025
hard
LIB
Hady Habib
#600ATP
1412ELO
1364Hard ELO
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
Oconnell C.
7-6 7-6
Habib H.
Oconnell C.
79772
Habib H.
67630

Christopher Oconnell defeated Hady Habib 7-6 7-6 in the Doha round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Christopher Oconnell came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Oconnell C.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Habib H.

Habib H.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Oconnell C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Oconnell C.Habib H.
20
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Oconnell C.Habib H.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
35%
Break points saved·Even
63%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.9
9.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.5
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (72 vs 52). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Oconnell C.Habib H.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
49
44
Break points saved·Slight edge
98
92
Break points won·Clear edge
22
1
Deciding sets·Clear edge
38
56
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
93
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Oconnell C.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Habib H.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.6+293 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.4Hard Elo 1364
8.1Overall Elo 1673
ELO gap
1.9Overall Elo 1412
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.7
Surface form
8.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
22°CRain
Wind 13 km/hHumidity 77%
Final
Rublev A.[5]
Draper J.[8]
7-55-76-1
Semi-finals
Rublev A.[5]
Auger Aliassime F.
7-54-67-65
Draper J.[8]
Lehecka J.
3-67-626-3
Quarter-finals
Auger Aliassime F.
Medvedev D.[4]
6-30-0
Rublev A.[5]
De Minaur A.[2]
6-13-67-68
Lehecka J.
Alcaraz C.[1]
6-33-66-4
Draper J.[8]
Berrettini M.
4-66-46-3
R16
Auger Aliassime F.
Medjedovic H.
W/O
Draper J.[8]
Oconnell C.
6-26-1
Berrettini M.
Griekspoor T.
7-646-766-4
Lehecka J.
Marozsan F.
6-46-2
Alcaraz C.[1]
Nardi L.
6-14-66-3
Rublev A.[5]
Borges N.
6-36-4
De Minaur A.[2]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-46-4
Medvedev D.[4]
Bergs Z.
6-26-1
R32
Griekspoor T.
Struff J.
7-657-67
Oconnell C.
Habib H.
7-677-63
Rublev A.[5]
Bublik A.
6-36-4
Borges N.
Virtanen O.
7-666-3
Bergs Z.
Bautista Agut R.
6-47-64
Berrettini M.
Djokovic N.[3]
7-646-2
Lehecka J.
Dimitrov G.[7]
6-46-4
Medjedovic H.
Tsitsipas S.[6]
7-665-77-65
Alcaraz C.[1]
Cilic M.
6-46-4
Marozsan F.
Dougaz A.
7-56-3
Van De Zandschulp B.
Shelbayh A.
7-56-3
Nardi L.
Zhang Z.
6-46-3
Draper J.[8]
Popyrin A.
6-27-64
Auger Aliassime F.
Halys Q.
4-66-47-62
De Minaur A.[2]
Safiullin R.
6-17-5
Medvedev D.[4]
Khachanov K.
4-67-56-3