Nicolai Budkov Kjaer vs Liam Draxl — Glasgow CH Quarter-final

Glasgow CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
NOR
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
#118ATP
1620ELO
1598Hard ELO
$293kYTD
$747kCAREER
19 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 February 2025
hard
Liam Draxl
CAN4
Liam Draxl
#223ATP
1592ELO
1565Hard ELO
$201kYTD
$642kCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-3 1-6 6-1
Draxl L.
Budkov Kjaer N.
6162
Draxl L.
3611

Nicolai Budkov Kjaer defeated Liam Draxl 6-3 1-6 6-1 in the Glasgow CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Nicolai Budkov Kjaer came in ranked #118.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Budkov Kjaer N.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Draxl L.

Draxl L.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Budkov Kjaer N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Budkov Kjaer N.Draxl L.
1st serve in·Even
64%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Even
4.3
4.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (103 vs 108). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Budkov Kjaer N.Draxl L.
Clutch Rating·Even
67
66
Break points saved·Slight edge
78
83
Break points won·Even
39
36
Deciding sets·Even
96
94
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
81
75

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Budkov Kjaer N.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Draxl L.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.9+33 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.1Hard Elo 1565
6.2Overall Elo 1620
ELO gap
3.8Overall Elo 1592
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.1
Surface form
6.1
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
9.2
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Budkov Kjaer N.Draxl L.
Freshness·Even
100
98

Budkov Kjaer N.: 19 days rest · Draxl L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Budkov Kjaer N.
Durasovic V.
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Budkov Kjaer N.
Rehberg M.
6-37-63
Durasovic V.
Rincon D.
6-726-36-0
Quarter-finals
Rehberg M.
Monday J.
7-654-64-2
Rincon D.
Yevseyev D.
6-36-3
Budkov Kjaer N.
Draxl L.[4]
6-31-66-1
Durasovic V.
Martineau M.
4-66-37-63
R16
Monday J.
Hussey G.
7-56-3
Draxl L.[4]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-36-2
Yevseyev D.
Henning P.
6-26-3
Durasovic V.
Wong C.[2]
4-66-16-2
Rincon D.
Evans D.[3]
7-677-69
Martineau M.
Zhukayev B.
6-46-4
Rehberg M.
Lestienne C.[1]
6-37-65
Budkov Kjaer N.
Brancaccio R.
6-47-67
R32
Brancaccio R.
Hassan B.
7-52-66-3
Budkov Kjaer N.
Grenier H.[6]
6-33-66-2
Henning P.
Onclin G.[7]
6-46-3
Yevseyev D.
Wendelken H.
7-56-3
Rincon D.
Rodesch C.
6-46-786-4
Martineau M.
Chidekh C.[5]
6-47-63
Zhukayev B.
Bertola R.
7-636-3
Durasovic V.
Story J.
6-16-776-2
Wong C.[2]
Molleker R.
6-36-2
Lestienne C.[1]
Searle H.
7-56-0
Evans D.[3]
Parker S.
6-37-65
Rehberg M.
Negritu C.
6-16-2
Monday J.
Sakamoto R.
7-666-4
Hussey G.
Kasnikowski M.[8]
6-46-766-4
Draxl L.[4]
Andreev A.
6-46-1
Zapata Miralles B.
Masur D.
6-26-3