Richard Gasquet vs Charles Broom — Pau CH Round of 32

Pau CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA3
Richard Gasquet
40 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 February 2025
hard
GBR
Charles Broom
#285ATP
1409ELO
1396Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLLW
Gasquet R.
6-3 7-6
Broom C.
Gasquet R.
6772
Broom C.
3640

Richard Gasquet defeated Charles Broom 6-3 7-6 in the Pau CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gasquet R.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Broom C.

Broom C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Gasquet R.

Serve advantage — Broom C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gasquet R.Broom C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
57%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.1
6.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (9 vs 42). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gasquet R.Broom C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
76
12
Break points saved·Dominant
97
56
Break points won·Dominant
49
0
Deciding sets·Dominant
84
42
Tiebreaks·Dominant
94
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gasquet R.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Broom C.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.0
Surface form
1.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 6
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
7.6
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Collignon R.[2]
Zahraj P.
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Collignon R.[2]
Bouquier A.
6-47-65
Zahraj P.
Klein L.[8]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Zahraj P.
Fery A.
6-33-66-3
Bouquier A.
Cassone M.
4-67-696-2
Collignon R.[2]
Misolic F.
6-46-3
Klein L.[8]
Fearnley J.[1]
6-36-3
R16
Fearnley J.[1]
Karlovskiy E.
6-46-2
Klein L.[8]
Poullain L.
6-37-5
Cassone M.
Blockx A.[7]
6-26-2
Bouquier A.
Bertrand R.
5-77-637-68
Collignon R.[2]
Vatutin A.
6-06-1
Fery A.
Gasquet R.[3]
W/O
Misolic F.
Cachin P.
6-43-66-2
Zahraj P.
Mayot H.[5]
6-26-4
R32
Blockx A.[7]
Guinard M.
2-3
Poullain L.
Gaubas V.
5-76-26-0
Klein L.[8]
Escoffier A.
6-36-4
Gasquet R.[3]
Broom C.
6-37-64
Fery A.
Sun F.
6-11-66-3
Cassone M.
Van Assche L.
2-66-06-2
Bertrand R.
Delage P.
6-46-2
Bouquier A.
Landaluce M.[4]
6-736-37-5
Misolic F.
Butvilas E.
4-67-56-3
Collignon R.[2]
Beauge M.
7-634-66-3
Mayot H.[5]
Cui J.
6-26-2
Cachin P.
Barrere G.[6]
7-56-3
Zahraj P.
Kachmazov A.
6-36-1
Karlovskiy E.
Janvier M.
6-46-766-4
Vatutin A.
Herbert P.
6-47-65
Fearnley J.[1]
Pokorny L.
6-46-4