Elias Ymer vs Elmer Moller — New Delhi CH Round of 32

New Delhi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Elias Ymer
SWE
Elias Ymer
#188ATP
1548ELO
1527Hard ELO
$191kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 February 2025
hard
DEN5
Elmer Moller
#147ATP
1609ELO
1484Hard ELO
$153kYTD
$725kCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWLW
Ymer E.
6-3 6-1
Moller E.
Ymer E.
662
Moller E.
310

Elias Ymer defeated Elmer Moller 6-3 6-1 in the New Delhi CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Elias Ymer came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Elias Ymer extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-01-19Australian OpenQ2hardElias Ymer4-6 6-4 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Ymer E.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Moller E.

Moller E.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Ymer E.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ymer E.Moller E.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
57%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
43%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.4
2.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.0
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (89 vs 75). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ymer E.Moller E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
48
69
Break points saved·Even
83
81
Break points won·Dominant
23
58
Deciding sets·Even
78
81
Tiebreaks·Dominant
35
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ymer E.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Moller E.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.6+43 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.4Hard Elo 1484
4.4Overall Elo 1548
ELO gap
5.6Overall Elo 1609
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.4
Surface form
5.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.1
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ymer E.Moller E.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
94

Ymer E.: 17 days rest · Moller E.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Jacquet K.
Harris B.[2]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Jacquet K.
Kopriva V.[1]
6-36-1
Harris B.[2]
Schoolkate T.[3]
4-67-646-2
Quarter-finals
Kopriva V.[1]
Mochizuki S.[6]
6-26-4
Jacquet K.
Geerts M.
6-37-63
Schoolkate T.[3]
Ilagan A.
6-727-616-2
Harris B.[2]
Ymer E.
6-24-67-61
R16
Jacquet K.
Clarke J.
7-56-3
Kopriva V.[1]
Svrcina D.
6-46-1
Geerts M.
Mukund S.
6-47-5
Ilagan A.
Skatov T.[8]
6-26-3
Ymer E.
Agafonov E.
6-36-4
Mochizuki S.[6]
Barton H.
2-66-46-3
Schoolkate T.[3]
Vacherot V.
7-643-66-4
Harris B.[2]
Mccabe J.
7-626-3
R32
Vacherot V.
Vesely J.
6-16-4
Kopriva V.[1]
Denolly C.
6-36-4
Barton H.
Noguchi R.
3-66-36-4
Mochizuki S.[6]
Holmgren A.
6-37-5
Geerts M.
Piros Z.
6-37-5
Clarke J.
Imamura M.
6-16-4
Jacquet K.
Shimabukuro S.[7]
6-16-2
Skatov T.[8]
Singh K.
6-46-0
Ilagan A.
Gengel M.
6-26-2
Schoolkate T.[3]
Kirkin E.
6-07-610
Ymer E.
Moller E.[5]
6-36-1
Agafonov E.
Ovcharenko O.
6-36-0
Mccabe J.
Dalla Valle E.
2-66-26-3
Harris B.[2]
Vanshelboim E.
6-16-4
Svrcina D.
Ramanathan R.
6-22-66-0
Mukund S.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
4-66-26-0