Filip Misolic vs Jakub Paul — Tenerife 2 CH Round of 16

Tenerife 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Filip Misolic
AUT
Filip Misolic
#221ATP
1587ELO
1469Hard ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 February 2025
hard
SUI
Jakub Paul
#527ATP
1389ELO
1340Hard ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLWW
Misolic F.
6-4 6-4
Paul J.
Misolic F.
662
Paul J.
440

Filip Misolic defeated Jakub Paul 6-4 6-4 in the Tenerife 2 CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Filip Misolic came in ranked #221, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Filip Misolic edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Misolic F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Paul J.

Paul J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Misolic F.Paul J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.5
1.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
1.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (84 vs 65). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Misolic F.Paul J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
79
21
Break points saved·Dominant
91
62
Break points won·Dominant
53
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
5
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
97
85

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Misolic F.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Paul J.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.6+129 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.4Hard Elo 1340
7.5Overall Elo 1587
ELO gap
2.5Overall Elo 1389
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
6.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
0.1
7.0
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Carreno Busta P.[3]
Misolic F.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Misolic F.
Rincon D.
6-36-2
Carreno Busta P.[3]
Hassan B.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Hassan B.
Barranco Cosano J.
5-4
Carreno Busta P.[3]
Shelbayh A.
6-22-1
Misolic F.
Koepfer D.[1]
6-22-67-64
Rincon D.
Alvarez Varona N.
7-645-76-1
R16
Misolic F.
Paul J.
6-46-4
Rincon D.
Cachin P.
6-17-65
Hassan B.
Moro Canas A.[5]
6-31-66-2
Barranco Cosano J.
Ruusuvuori E.[2]
7-51-66-3
Alvarez Varona N.
Diez S.
2-2
Carreno Busta P.[3]
Escoffier A.
W/O
Koepfer D.[1]
Rodesch C.
7-56-3
Shelbayh A.
Andrade A.
7-652-66-4
R32
Koepfer D.[1]
Fonio G.
6-34-66-2
Paul J.
Buse I.
6-36-1
Misolic F.
Taberner C.[6]
4-66-16-3
Rincon D.
Rottgering M.
7-6106-2
Diez S.
Llamas Ruiz P.
6-46-3
Alvarez Varona N.
Spizzirri E.[7]
7-56-0
Shelbayh A.
Gaubas V.[8]
4-66-47-5
Andrade A.
Montes De La Torre I.
7-666-0
Escoffier A.
Butvilas E.
6-23-66-0
Carreno Busta P.[3]
Cui J.
6-36-4
Moro Canas A.[5]
Martin Tiffon P.
6-46-2
Ruusuvuori E.[2]
Choinski J.
6-36-1
Hassan B.
Neumayer L.
4-66-17-5
Rodesch C.
Monday J.
7-626-3
Cachin P.
Rocha H.[4]
6-20-0
Barranco Cosano J.
Arnaboldi F.
6-26-2