Andrea Vavassori vs Brandon Holt — Manama CH Semi-final

Manama CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
ITA
Andrea Vavassori
#559ATP
1688ELO
1655Hard ELO
31 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 February 2025
hard
USA
Brandon Holt
#558ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Vavassori A.
6-4 4-6 6-4
Holt B.
Vavassori A.
6462
Holt B.
4641

Andrea Vavassori defeated Brandon Holt 6-4 4-6 6-4 in the Manama CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Andrea Vavassori edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 4–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Vavassori A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Holt B.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Vavassori A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Vavassori A.Holt B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.0
5.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.8
0.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (23 vs 75). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Vavassori A.Holt B.
Clutch Rating·Even
57
58
Break points saved·Slight edge
93
85
Break points won·Even
33
31
Deciding sets·Clear edge
58
79
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
82
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Vavassori A.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Holt B.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
6.8+148 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.2Hard Elo 1507
6.9Overall Elo 1688
ELO gap
3.1Overall Elo 1537
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.4
Surface form
6.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
6.7
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Fucsovics M.[1]
Vavassori A.
6-36-736-4
Semi-finals
Fucsovics M.[1]
Sharipov M.
6-26-1
Vavassori A.
Holt B.
6-44-66-4
Quarter-finals
Fucsovics M.[1]
Durasovic V.
6-47-5
Sharipov M.
Ajdukovic D.[7]
4-67-647-61
Vavassori A.
Galarneau A.
6-26-1
Holt B.
Atmane T.[8]
3-66-46-1
R16
Fucsovics M.[1]
Dougaz A.
6-26-3
Sharipov M.
De Jong J.[3]
6-36-4
Ajdukovic D.[7]
Jianu F.
6-12-67-5
Vavassori A.
Kukushkin M.[4]
2-66-36-2
Atmane T.[8]
Wong C.
6-16-4
Holt B.
Evans D.
4-67-57-5
Galarneau A.
Simakin I.
6-44-66-4
Durasovic V.
Budkov Kjaer N.
7-656-2
R32
Budkov Kjaer N.
Andreev A.
7-51-0
Fucsovics M.[1]
Mejia N.
6-16-1
Dougaz A.
Broom C.
7-53-67-63
Sharipov M.
Zhukayev B.
6-47-64
Ajdukovic D.[7]
Lestienne C.
4-66-47-64
Simakin I.
Uchiyama Y.[5]
7-626-4
Vavassori A.
Kuzmanov D.
6-32-66-3
Atmane T.[8]
Sun F.
6-36-2
Holt B.
Kotov P.[2]
7-56-4
Galarneau A.
Yevseyev D.
7-616-776-3
Durasovic V.
Basilashvili N.[6]
6-33-67-66
De Jong J.[3]
Karatsev A.
2-67-626-2
Jianu F.
Bar Biryukov P.
6-746-06-3
Wong C.
Bakshi A.
7-57-5
Evans D.
Paire B.
6-46-746-2
Kukushkin M.[4]
Karlovskiy E.
6-26-3