Terence Atmane vs Coleman Wong — Manama CH Round of 16

Manama CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Terence Atmane
FRA8
Terence Atmane
#50ATP
1704ELO
1674Hard ELO
$707kYTD
$2.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 February 2025
hard
HKG
Coleman Wong
#111ATP
1602ELO
1593Hard ELO
$287kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWLWLL
Atmane T.
6-1 6-4
Wong C.
Atmane T.
662
Wong C.
140

Terence Atmane defeated Coleman Wong 6-1 6-4 in the Manama CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Terence Atmane came in ranked #50.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Atmane T.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Wong C.

Wong C.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Atmane T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Atmane T.Wong C.
36
Serve
37
27
Return
34

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Atmane T.Wong C.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
65%
Return points won·Even
35%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.6
8.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (85 vs 99). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Atmane T.Wong C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
56
43
Break points saved·Even
95
91
Break points won·Clear edge
25
5
Deciding sets·Slight edge
54
43
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
96
88

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Atmane T.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Wong C.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.6+81 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.4Hard Elo 1593
5.7Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
4.3Overall Elo 1602
4.6No prior meetings
H2H
5.4
3.6
Surface form
6.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Atmane T.Wong C.
Freshness·Slight edge
95
100

Atmane T.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Wong C.: 21 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Fucsovics M.[1]
Vavassori A.
6-36-736-4
Semi-finals
Fucsovics M.[1]
Sharipov M.
6-26-1
Vavassori A.
Holt B.
6-44-66-4
Quarter-finals
Fucsovics M.[1]
Durasovic V.
6-47-5
Sharipov M.
Ajdukovic D.[7]
4-67-647-61
Vavassori A.
Galarneau A.
6-26-1
Holt B.
Atmane T.[8]
3-66-46-1
R16
Fucsovics M.[1]
Dougaz A.
6-26-3
Sharipov M.
De Jong J.[3]
6-36-4
Ajdukovic D.[7]
Jianu F.
6-12-67-5
Vavassori A.
Kukushkin M.[4]
2-66-36-2
Atmane T.[8]
Wong C.
6-16-4
Holt B.
Evans D.
4-67-57-5
Galarneau A.
Simakin I.
6-44-66-4
Durasovic V.
Budkov Kjaer N.
7-656-2
R32
Budkov Kjaer N.
Andreev A.
7-51-0
Fucsovics M.[1]
Mejia N.
6-16-1
Dougaz A.
Broom C.
7-53-67-63
Sharipov M.
Zhukayev B.
6-47-64
Ajdukovic D.[7]
Lestienne C.
4-66-47-64
Simakin I.
Uchiyama Y.[5]
7-626-4
Vavassori A.
Kuzmanov D.
6-32-66-3
Atmane T.[8]
Sun F.
6-36-2
Holt B.
Kotov P.[2]
7-56-4
Galarneau A.
Yevseyev D.
7-616-776-3
Durasovic V.
Basilashvili N.[6]
6-33-67-66
De Jong J.[3]
Karatsev A.
2-67-626-2
Jianu F.
Bar Biryukov P.
6-746-06-3
Wong C.
Bakshi A.
7-57-5
Evans D.
Paire B.
6-46-746-2
Kukushkin M.[4]
Karlovskiy E.
6-26-3