Brandon Holt vs Terence Atmane — Manama CH Quarter-final

Manama CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA
Brandon Holt
#558ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 February 2025
hard
Terence Atmane
FRA8
Terence Atmane
#52ATP
1704ELO
1674Hard ELO
$707kYTD
$2.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
Holt B.
3-6 6-4 6-1
Atmane T.
Holt B.
3662
Atmane T.
6411

Brandon Holt defeated Terence Atmane 3-6 6-4 6-1 in the Manama CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Terence Atmane came in ranked #52. Brandon Holt extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-02-19Los CabosQ1hardBrandon Holt6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Holt B.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Atmane T.

Atmane T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Holt B.Atmane T.
—
Serve
36
—
Return
27

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Holt B.Atmane T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
35%
Break points saved·Even
62%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.5
7.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
0.9
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (75 vs 85). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Holt B.Atmane T.
Clutch Rating·Even
58
56
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
95
Break points won·Slight edge
31
25
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
54
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
96

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holt B.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Atmane T.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.7Hard Elo 1507
Surface ELO
7.3+166 Hard Elo edge
2.4Overall Elo 1537
ELO gap
7.6Overall Elo 1704
10.0
H2H
0.0
6.8
Surface form
3.6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
7.1
7.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Holt B.Atmane T.
Freshness·
—
93

Atmane T.: 10 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Fucsovics M.[1]
Vavassori A.
6-36-736-4
Semi-finals
Fucsovics M.[1]
Sharipov M.
6-26-1
Vavassori A.
Holt B.
6-44-66-4
Quarter-finals
Fucsovics M.[1]
Durasovic V.
6-47-5
Sharipov M.
Ajdukovic D.[7]
4-67-647-61
Vavassori A.
Galarneau A.
6-26-1
Holt B.
Atmane T.[8]
3-66-46-1
R16
Fucsovics M.[1]
Dougaz A.
6-26-3
Sharipov M.
De Jong J.[3]
6-36-4
Ajdukovic D.[7]
Jianu F.
6-12-67-5
Vavassori A.
Kukushkin M.[4]
2-66-36-2
Atmane T.[8]
Wong C.
6-16-4
Holt B.
Evans D.
4-67-57-5
Galarneau A.
Simakin I.
6-44-66-4
Durasovic V.
Budkov Kjaer N.
7-656-2
R32
Budkov Kjaer N.
Andreev A.
7-51-0
Fucsovics M.[1]
Mejia N.
6-16-1
Dougaz A.
Broom C.
7-53-67-63
Sharipov M.
Zhukayev B.
6-47-64
Ajdukovic D.[7]
Lestienne C.
4-66-47-64
Simakin I.
Uchiyama Y.[5]
7-626-4
Vavassori A.
Kuzmanov D.
6-32-66-3
Atmane T.[8]
Sun F.
6-36-2
Holt B.
Kotov P.[2]
7-56-4
Galarneau A.
Yevseyev D.
7-616-776-3
Durasovic V.
Basilashvili N.[6]
6-33-67-66
De Jong J.[3]
Karatsev A.
2-67-626-2
Jianu F.
Bar Biryukov P.
6-746-06-3
Wong C.
Bakshi A.
7-57-5
Evans D.
Paire B.
6-46-746-2
Kukushkin M.[4]
Karlovskiy E.
6-26-3