Adam Walton vs Govind Nanda — Brisbane 2 CH Round of 32

Brisbane 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Adam Walton
AUS1
Adam Walton
#79ATP
1703ELO
1669Hard ELO
$499kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 February 2025
hard
USA
Govind Nanda
#781ATP
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWWLW
Walton A.
6-2 6-4
Nanda G.
Walton A.
662
Nanda G.
240

Adam Walton defeated Govind Nanda 6-2 6-4 in the Brisbane 2 CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Adam Walton came in ranked #79.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Walton A.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Nanda G.

Nanda G.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Walton A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Walton A.Nanda G.
35
Serve
—
27
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Walton A.Nanda G.
1st serve in·Even
63%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
60%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.8
2.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (108 vs 23). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Walton A.Nanda G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
65
5
Break points saved·Dominant
95
38
Break points won·Even
20
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
95
15
Tiebreaks·
70
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Walton A.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Nanda G.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
4.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.6
Minutes 14d
6.2
7.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Walton A.Nanda G.
Freshness·
46
—

Walton A.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 122 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Walton A.[1]
Kubler J.
7-667-64
Semi-finals
Kubler J.
Langmo C.
6-46-4
Walton A.[1]
Jasika O.[6]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Jasika O.[6]
Tu L.[4]
2-67-56-2
Langmo C.
Shimizu Y.[5]
6-46-756-3
Kubler J.
Mccabe J.[8]
7-616-1
Walton A.[1]
Ilagan A.
6-36-4
R16
Tu L.[4]
Delaney J.
6-06-776-4
Jasika O.[6]
Gengel M.
7-613-66-3
Kubler J.
Hsu Y.
6-26-1
Walton A.[1]
Moriya H.
6-36-4
Ilagan A.
Imamura M.
2-67-636-0
Mccabe J.[8]
Hulme M.
6-36-4
Langmo C.
Janvier M.
5-76-46-4
Shimizu Y.[5]
Ogura K.
6-22-66-1
R32
Delaney J.
Marinkov P.
7-653-67-65
Hulme M.
Zhou Y.
0-66-46-4
Ogura K.
Nakagawa N.
7-647-65
Moriya H.
Weber A.
6-46-2
Ilagan A.
Saitoh K.
7-56-2
Janvier M.
Bolt A.[3]
6-46-4
Kubler J.
Schoolkate T.[2]
6-43-66-3
Jasika O.[6]
Ellis B.
6-36-2
Hsu Y.
Bouzige M.
7-57-62
Shimizu Y.[5]
Matsuoka H.
6-33-66-3
Tu L.[4]
Shiraishi H.
6-16-1
Langmo C.
Sweeny D.
6-26-2
Walton A.[1]
Nanda G.
6-26-4
Imamura M.
Tomic B.[7]
6-23-66-2
Mccabe J.[8]
Bradshaw J.
6-36-1
Gengel M.
Broom C.
6-16-2