Casper Ruud vs Jaume Munar — Dallas Semi-final

Dallas · ATP · Semi-final
Casper Ruud
NOR2
Casper Ruud
#12ATP
1983ELO
1889Hard ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 February 2025
hard
Jaume Munar
ESP
Jaume Munar
#44ATP
1766ELO
1743Hard ELO
$549kYTD
$7.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLWWL
Ruud C.
6-2 2-6 7-6
Munar J.
Ruud C.
62772
Munar J.
26641

Casper Ruud defeated Jaume Munar 6-2 2-6 7-6 in the Dallas semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Casper Ruud came in ranked #12, leading the head-to-head 6–1. Casper Ruud extended the head-to-head to 7–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Casper Ruud closed it out in three sets, 6–2 2–6 7–6.

Head to head

6–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-04-22Madrid MastersR64clayCasper Ruud6-0 6-1
2026-01-19Australian OpenR64hardCasper Ruud6-3 7-5 6-4
2025-05-07Rome MastersR16clayCasper Ruud6-3 6-4
2025-01-13Australian OpenR128hardCasper Ruud6-3 1-6 7-5 2-6 6-1
2022-10-03TokyoR32hardJaume Munar6-3 6-3
2022-07-18GstaadQFclayCasper Ruud7-6(3) 7-6(4)
2018-07-16BastadR32clayCasper Ruud6-7(7) 6-4 6-0
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Ruud C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Munar J.

Munar J.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Ruud C.Munar J.
59
Serve
42
31
Return
60

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ruud C.Munar J.
1st serve in·Even
66%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
68%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.1
4.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (70 vs 65). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruud C.Munar J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
50
Break points saved·Even
99
95
Break points won·Slight edge
75
66
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
30
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
46

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ruud C.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Munar J.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.2+146 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.8Hard Elo 1743
6.6Overall Elo 1983
ELO gap
3.4Overall Elo 1766
5.4
H2H
4.6
7.4
Surface form
5.0
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ruud C.Munar J.
Freshness·Clear edge
97
84

Ruud C.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Munar J.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Shapovalov D.
Ruud C.[2]
7-656-3
Semi-finals
Ruud C.[2]
Munar J.
6-22-67-64
Shapovalov D.
Paul T.[3]
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Ruud C.[2]
Nishioka Y.
7-53-2
Shapovalov D.
Machac T.[6]
7-656-0
Paul T.[3]
Opelka R.
7-636-2
Munar J.
Arnaldi M.[8]
6-43-66-3
R16
Shapovalov D.
Fritz T.[1]
2-66-37-62
Ruud C.[2]
Mmoh M.
6-16-4
Machac T.[6]
Hijikata R.
6-47-60
Paul T.[3]
Quinn E.
6-45-76-4
Opelka R.
Norrie C.
4-67-656-4
Arnaldi M.[8]
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-16-3
Munar J.
Shelton B.[4]
6-27-63
Nishioka Y.
Tiafoe F.[5]
3-66-46-3
R32
Fritz T.[1]
Rinderknech A.
6-46-2
Opelka R.
Shevchenko A.
7-636-4
Shapovalov D.
Kecmanovic M.
6-36-756-3
Machac T.[6]
Nishikori K.
6-26-2
Paul T.[3]
Brooksby J.
6-766-36-4
Nishioka Y.
Nakashima B.
6-47-66
Ruud C.[2]
Duckworth J.
7-54-66-2
Hijikata R.
Mannarino A.
7-56-3
Tiafoe F.[5]
Daniel T.
6-13-66-4
Mmoh M.
Carballes Baena R.
6-13-66-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Holt B.
6-17-5
Shelton B.[4]
Vukic A.
6-36-3
Quinn E.
Svajda T.
6-46-2
Munar J.
Yunchaokete B.
7-56-2
Arnaldi M.[8]
Eubanks C.
6-36-4
Norrie C.
Michelsen A.[7]
2-67-616-1