Christian Langmo vs Dane Sweeny — Brisbane 2 CH Round of 32

Brisbane 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Christian Langmo
USA
Christian Langmo
#467ATP
1267ELO
1254Hard ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 February 2025
hard
AUS
Dane Sweeny
#122ATP
1460ELO
1444Hard ELO
$256kYTD
$861kCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Langmo C.
6-2 6-2
Sweeny D.
Langmo C.
662
Sweeny D.
220

Christian Langmo defeated Dane Sweeny 6-2 6-2 in the Brisbane 2 CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Dane Sweeny came in ranked #122.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Langmo C.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Sweeny D.

Sweeny D.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Langmo C.

Serve advantage — Sweeny D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Langmo C.Sweeny D.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
68%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.0
2.9
Double faults / match·Even
3.5
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (62 vs 48). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Langmo C.Sweeny D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
23
45
Break points saved·Clear edge
88
69
Break points won·Slight edge
1
11
Deciding sets·Dominant
22
68
Tiebreaks·Dominant
39
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Langmo C.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Sweeny D.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
1.9Hard Elo 1254
Surface ELO
8.1+190 Hard Elo edge
1.6Overall Elo 1267
ELO gap
8.4Overall Elo 1460
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.0
Surface form
3.8
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
8.9
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Langmo C.Sweeny D.
Freshness·Slight edge
86
97

Langmo C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 22 games (7d) · Sweeny D.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Walton A.[1]
Kubler J.
7-667-64
Semi-finals
Kubler J.
Langmo C.
6-46-4
Walton A.[1]
Jasika O.[6]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Jasika O.[6]
Tu L.[4]
2-67-56-2
Langmo C.
Shimizu Y.[5]
6-46-756-3
Kubler J.
Mccabe J.[8]
7-616-1
Walton A.[1]
Ilagan A.
6-36-4
R16
Tu L.[4]
Delaney J.
6-06-776-4
Jasika O.[6]
Gengel M.
7-613-66-3
Kubler J.
Hsu Y.
6-26-1
Walton A.[1]
Moriya H.
6-36-4
Ilagan A.
Imamura M.
2-67-636-0
Mccabe J.[8]
Hulme M.
6-36-4
Langmo C.
Janvier M.
5-76-46-4
Shimizu Y.[5]
Ogura K.
6-22-66-1
R32
Delaney J.
Marinkov P.
7-653-67-65
Hulme M.
Zhou Y.
0-66-46-4
Ogura K.
Nakagawa N.
7-647-65
Moriya H.
Weber A.
6-46-2
Ilagan A.
Saitoh K.
7-56-2
Janvier M.
Bolt A.[3]
6-46-4
Kubler J.
Schoolkate T.[2]
6-43-66-3
Jasika O.[6]
Ellis B.
6-36-2
Hsu Y.
Bouzige M.
7-57-62
Shimizu Y.[5]
Matsuoka H.
6-33-66-3
Tu L.[4]
Shiraishi H.
6-16-1
Langmo C.
Sweeny D.
6-26-2
Walton A.[1]
Nanda G.
6-26-4
Imamura M.
Tomic B.[7]
6-23-66-2
Mccabe J.[8]
Bradshaw J.
6-36-1
Gengel M.
Broom C.
6-16-2