Jerome Kym vs Patrick Zahraj — Lille CH Round of 32

Lille CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SUI6
Jerome Kym
#186ATP
1599ELO
1591Hard ELO
$89kYTD
$731kCAREER
23 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 February 2025
hard
GER
Patrick Zahraj
#425ATP
1331ELO
1322Hard ELO
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
Kym J.
6-1 4-6 6-1
Zahraj P.
Kym J.
6462
Zahraj P.
1611

Jerome Kym defeated Patrick Zahraj 6-1 4-6 6-1 in the Lille CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Jerome Kym came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 4–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kym J.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Zahraj P.

Zahraj P.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Kym J.

Serve advantage — Kym J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kym J.Zahraj P.
1st serve in·Even
62%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
64%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.3
5.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.8
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (54 vs 82). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kym J.Zahraj P.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
20
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
69
Break points won·Slight edge
21
10
Deciding sets·Slight edge
17
7
Tiebreaks·Even
80
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kym J.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Zahraj P.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.9+269 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.1Hard Elo 1322
8.2Overall Elo 1599
ELO gap
1.8Overall Elo 1331
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
7.3
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
8.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kym J.Zahraj P.
Freshness·Slight edge
69
80

Kym J.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 72 games (7d) · Zahraj P.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 53 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Bouquier A.
Pouille L.[3]
6-33-5
Semi-finals
Bouquier A.
Hemery C.
7-624-66-4
Pouille L.[3]
Royer V.
3-66-46-2
Quarter-finals
Hemery C.
Rehberg M.
6-46-0
Pouille L.[3]
Blockx A.[8]
7-646-3
Royer V.
Gea A.
7-626-2
Bouquier A.
Paris T.
6-36-1
R16
Rehberg M.
Kym J.[6]
W/O
Gea A.
Prihodko O.
6-37-5
Bouquier A.
Bonzi B.[1]
6-26-756-3
Paris T.
Poullain L.
7-656-3
Hemery C.
Majchrzak K.[4]
6-46-3
Blockx A.[8]
Kachmazov A.
6-36-4
Pouille L.[3]
Grenier H.
7-656-3
Royer V.
Malige M.
6-44-66-2
R32
Blockx A.[8]
Dougaz A.
7-56-1
Paris T.
Paire B.
6-35-76-4
Poullain L.
Gigante M.[9]
6-26-3
Majchrzak K.[4]
Van Assche L.
6-47-65
Hemery C.
Marionneau L.
6-26-2
Rehberg M.
Paul J.
3-67-647-5
Kachmazov A.
Jianu F.
7-56-3
Malige M.
Squire H.
6-23-67-65
Gea A.
Gentzsch T.
6-47-5
Prihodko O.
Nardi L.[2]
6-37-5
Royer V.
Kasnikowski M.
6-06-3
Bonzi B.[1]
Herbert P.
6-31-66-4
Kym J.[6]
Zahraj P.
6-14-66-1
Pouille L.[3]
Chidekh C.
5-77-636-4
Bouquier A.
Martineau M.
6-37-63
Grenier H.
Atmane T.
3-66-36-4