Adam Walton vs Jason Kubler — Brisbane 2 CH Final

Brisbane 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Adam Walton
AUS1
Adam Walton
#79ATP
1703ELO
1669Hard ELO
$499kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 February 2025
hard
AUS
Jason Kubler
#468ATP
1685ELO
1635Hard ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWLLW
Walton A.
7-6 7-6
Kubler J.
Walton A.
78772
Kubler J.
66640

Adam Walton defeated Jason Kubler 7-6 7-6 in the Brisbane 2 CH final on hard. The result followed the form book — Adam Walton came in ranked #79.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Walton A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kubler J.

Kubler J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Walton A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Walton A.Kubler J.
35
Serve
—
17
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Walton A.Kubler J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
66%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Even
6.7
6.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (108 vs 38). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Walton A.Kubler J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
65
59
Break points saved·Slight edge
95
90
Break points won·Dominant
20
46
Deciding sets·Clear edge
95
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Walton A.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Kubler J.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.0+34 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.0Hard Elo 1635
4.8Overall Elo 1703
ELO gap
5.2Overall Elo 1685
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
2.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.6
Minutes 14d
7.5
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Walton A.Kubler J.
Freshness·
54
—

Walton A.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 122 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Walton A.[1]
Kubler J.
7-667-64
Semi-finals
Kubler J.
Langmo C.
6-46-4
Walton A.[1]
Jasika O.[6]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Jasika O.[6]
Tu L.[4]
2-67-56-2
Langmo C.
Shimizu Y.[5]
6-46-756-3
Kubler J.
Mccabe J.[8]
7-616-1
Walton A.[1]
Ilagan A.
6-36-4
R16
Tu L.[4]
Delaney J.
6-06-776-4
Jasika O.[6]
Gengel M.
7-613-66-3
Kubler J.
Hsu Y.
6-26-1
Walton A.[1]
Moriya H.
6-36-4
Ilagan A.
Imamura M.
2-67-636-0
Mccabe J.[8]
Hulme M.
6-36-4
Langmo C.
Janvier M.
5-76-46-4
Shimizu Y.[5]
Ogura K.
6-22-66-1
R32
Delaney J.
Marinkov P.
7-653-67-65
Hulme M.
Zhou Y.
0-66-46-4
Ogura K.
Nakagawa N.
7-647-65
Moriya H.
Weber A.
6-46-2
Ilagan A.
Saitoh K.
7-56-2
Janvier M.
Bolt A.[3]
6-46-4
Kubler J.
Schoolkate T.[2]
6-43-66-3
Jasika O.[6]
Ellis B.
6-36-2
Hsu Y.
Bouzige M.
7-57-62
Shimizu Y.[5]
Matsuoka H.
6-33-66-3
Tu L.[4]
Shiraishi H.
6-16-1
Langmo C.
Sweeny D.
6-26-2
Walton A.[1]
Nanda G.
6-26-4
Imamura M.
Tomic B.[7]
6-23-66-2
Mccabe J.[8]
Bradshaw J.
6-36-1
Gengel M.
Broom C.
6-16-2