Adam Walton vs Omar Jasika — Brisbane 2 CH Semi-final

Brisbane 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Adam Walton
AUS1
Adam Walton
#79ATP
1703ELO
1669Hard ELO
$499kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 February 2025
hard
AUS6
Omar Jasika
#528ATP
1296ELO
1272Hard ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Walton A.
6-2 6-4
Jasika O.
Walton A.
662
Jasika O.
240

Adam Walton defeated Omar Jasika 6-2 6-4 in the Brisbane 2 CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Adam Walton came in ranked #79.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Walton A.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Jasika O.

Jasika O.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Walton A.

Serve advantage — Walton A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Walton A.Jasika O.
35
Serve
—
27
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Walton A.Jasika O.
1st serve in·Even
63%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
59%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.7
2.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (108 vs 64). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Walton A.Jasika O.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
65
0
Break points saved·Dominant
95
47
Break points won·Slight edge
20
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
95
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Walton A.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Jasika O.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.2+397 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.8Hard Elo 1272
9.4Overall Elo 1703
ELO gap
0.6Overall Elo 1296
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.9
Surface form
5.1
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.6
Minutes 14d
4.9
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Walton A.Jasika O.
Freshness·
46
—

Walton A.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 122 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Walton A.[1]
Kubler J.
7-667-64
Semi-finals
Kubler J.
Langmo C.
6-46-4
Walton A.[1]
Jasika O.[6]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Jasika O.[6]
Tu L.[4]
2-67-56-2
Langmo C.
Shimizu Y.[5]
6-46-756-3
Kubler J.
Mccabe J.[8]
7-616-1
Walton A.[1]
Ilagan A.
6-36-4
R16
Tu L.[4]
Delaney J.
6-06-776-4
Jasika O.[6]
Gengel M.
7-613-66-3
Kubler J.
Hsu Y.
6-26-1
Walton A.[1]
Moriya H.
6-36-4
Ilagan A.
Imamura M.
2-67-636-0
Mccabe J.[8]
Hulme M.
6-36-4
Langmo C.
Janvier M.
5-76-46-4
Shimizu Y.[5]
Ogura K.
6-22-66-1
R32
Delaney J.
Marinkov P.
7-653-67-65
Hulme M.
Zhou Y.
0-66-46-4
Ogura K.
Nakagawa N.
7-647-65
Moriya H.
Weber A.
6-46-2
Ilagan A.
Saitoh K.
7-56-2
Janvier M.
Bolt A.[3]
6-46-4
Kubler J.
Schoolkate T.[2]
6-43-66-3
Jasika O.[6]
Ellis B.
6-36-2
Hsu Y.
Bouzige M.
7-57-62
Shimizu Y.[5]
Matsuoka H.
6-33-66-3
Tu L.[4]
Shiraishi H.
6-16-1
Langmo C.
Sweeny D.
6-26-2
Walton A.[1]
Nanda G.
6-26-4
Imamura M.
Tomic B.[7]
6-23-66-2
Mccabe J.[8]
Bradshaw J.
6-36-1
Gengel M.
Broom C.
6-16-2