Maddison Inglis vs Himeno Sakatsume — W75 Brisbane Round of 16

W75 Brisbane · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Maddison Inglis
AUS
Maddison Inglis
#151WTA
1590ELO
1558Hard ELO
28 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 February 2025
hard
JPN
Himeno Sakatsume
#121WTA
1611ELO
1599Hard ELO
24 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Inglis M.
6-4 6-2
Sakatsume H.
Inglis M.
662
Sakatsume H.
42–

Maddison Inglis defeated Himeno Sakatsume 6-4 6-2 in the W75 Brisbane round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Himeno Sakatsume came in ranked #121.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Inglis M.serving56% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Sakatsume H.

Sakatsume H.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Inglis M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Inglis M.Sakatsume H.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
47%
Break points saved·Even
56%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
1.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.5
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (67 vs 92). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Inglis M.Sakatsume H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
22
62
Break points saved·Clear edge
50
64
Break points won·Dominant
25
97
Deciding sets·Dominant
35
62
Tiebreaks·
93
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Inglis M.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Sakatsume H.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.3Hard Elo 1558
Surface ELO
5.7+40 Hard Elo edge
4.3Overall Elo 1590
ELO gap
5.7Overall Elo 1611
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
6.9
Surface form
6.5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.0
3-set count
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Inglis M.Sakatsume H.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Inglis M.: 20 days rest · Sakatsume H.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Hon P.
Kung L.
6-44-66-2
Birrell K.
Inglis M.
6-24-67-62
Semi-finals
Kung L.
Sharma A.
6-26-3
Hon P.
Jones E.
3-66-47-63
Birrell K.
Preston T.
7-636-2
Inglis M.
Sharma A.
5-76-26-3
Quarter-finals
Sharma A.
Miller K.
7-636-1
Hon P.
Helgo M.
6-37-5
Kung L.
Preston T.
6-27-5
Jones E.
Inglis M.
7-653-66-4
Inglis M.
Ishii S.
6-47-5
Birrell K.
Zheng W.
6-46-4
Preston T.
Cabrera L.
6-03-67-5
Sharma A.
Hon P.
6-756-36-3
R16
Hon P.
Miller K.
6-35-76-4
Inglis M.
Sakatsume H.
6-46-2
Sharma A.
Jones E.
6-43-66-2
Cabrera L.
Liu C.
7-56-797-66
Zheng W.
Xu M.
6-26-3
Preston T.
Hosogi S.
6-46-4
Ishii S.
Guo H.
6-7107-56-4
Birrell K.
Jang S.
7-617-61
R32
Jang S.
Yao X.
4-66-26-3
Cabrera L.
Andrianjafitrimo T.
6-46-3
Sharma A.
Micic E.
6-46-1
Zavatska K.
Shi H.
7-655-76-3
Jones E.
Soboleva A.
4-67-56-1
Liu C.
Kaji H.
6-46-0
Ishii S.
Sakatsume H.
7-656-0
Preston T.
Hule P.
6-45-76-2
Sharma A.
Aiava D.
6-37-66
Cabrera L.
Soboleva A.
2-66-26-0
Xu M.
Kung L.
3-66-36-2
Zheng W.
Shi H.
4-66-36-1
Inglis M.
Kaji H.
7-56-3
Birrell K.
Ma Y.
6-16-3
Preston T.
Micic E.
7-56-3
Jang S.
Da Silva Fick G.
2-66-46-0
Guo H.
Kuramochi M.
6-06-1
Ishii S.
Ma L.
2-66-46-3
Hosogi S.
Mcphee K.
6-46-2
Jones E.
Andrianjafitrimo T.
6-26-3
Liu C.
Yao X.
6-14-66-2
Hon P.
Helgo M.
6-26-2
Sakatsume H.
Zavatska K.
2-66-06-5
Miller K.
Barry M.
2-66-37-5