Celine Naef vs Weronika Ewald — W75 Leszno Round of 16

W75 Leszno · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
SUI
Celine Naef
#211WTA
1671ELO
1653Hard ELO
21 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 February 2025
hard
POL
Weronika Ewald
#395WTA
1387ELO
1312Hard ELO
20 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWL
Naef C.
6-3 6-2
Ewald W.
Naef C.
662
Ewald W.
32–

Celine Naef defeated Weronika Ewald 6-3 6-2 in the W75 Leszno round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Naef C.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Ewald W.

Ewald W.serving54% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Naef C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Naef C.Ewald W.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
43%
Service points won·Even
59%
55%
Return points won·Even
43%
46%
Break points saved·Even
56%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.0
2.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.4
4.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (68 vs 59). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Naef C.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Ewald W.
3.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 70 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
9.1+341 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.9Hard Elo 1312
8.5Overall Elo 1671
ELO gap
1.5Overall Elo 1387
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
5.1
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Naef C.Ewald W.
Freshness·
100
—

Naef C.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Jacquemot E.
Gao X.
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Jacquemot E.
Erjavec V.
6-47-5
Gao X.
Hesse A.
6-26-2
Quarter-finals
Jacquemot E.
Radwanska U.
6-16-2
Gao X.
Mikulskyte J.
7-56-3
Hesse A.
Naef C.
W/O
R16
Radwanska U.
Koevermans A.
6-47-5
Hesse A.
Serban R.
7-56-2
Mikulskyte J.
Falkowska W.
6-37-65
Gao X.
Jamrichova R.
6-16-2
Jacquemot E.
Kubka M.
6-36-1
Naef C.
Ewald W.
6-36-2
Kolodynska J.
Iatcenko P.
7-56-3
Erjavec V.
Juvan K.
6-46-4
R32
Falkowska W.
Avdeeva J.
6-36-4
Kubka M.
Stankiewicz M.
4-67-57-62
Ewald W.
Hertel A.
6-26-3
Hesse A.
Laskevich E.
7-53-66-3
Jacquemot E.
Aksu A.
4-66-26-4
Iatcenko P.
Zidansek T.
6-37-5
Juvan K.
Ngounoue C.
6-32-66-2
Radwanska U.
Ciric Bagaric L.
0-67-56-1
Erjavec V.
Kmiecik A.
6-16-3
Kolodynska J.
Oz I.
4-66-36-4
Gao X.
Kolb N.
6-43-66-2
Jamrichova R.
Gabric A.
2-66-36-3
Naef C.
Bassols Ribera M.
7-56-4
Koevermans A.
Hatouka Y.
6-26-4
Mikulskyte J.
Lazaro Garcia A.
6-46-4