Marek Gengel vs Charles Broom — Brisbane 2 CH Round of 32

Brisbane 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Marek Gengel
CZE
Marek Gengel
#373ATP
1411ELO
1377Hard ELO
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 February 2025
hard
GBR
Charles Broom
#283ATP
1409ELO
1396Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWWLL
Gengel M.
6-1 6-2
Broom C.
Gengel M.
662
Broom C.
120

Marek Gengel defeated Charles Broom 6-1 6-2 in the Brisbane 2 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gengel M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Broom C.

Broom C.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Gengel M.

Serve advantage — Broom C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gengel M.Broom C.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
45%
53%
Service points won·Even
61%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.4
6.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (58 vs 42). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gengel M.Broom C.
Clutch Rating·Even
11
10
Break points saved·Clear edge
35
56
Break points won·Slight edge
10
0
Deciding sets·Clear edge
54
36
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
4
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gengel M.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Broom C.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.5Hard Elo 1377
Surface ELO
5.5+19 Hard Elo edge
4.5Overall Elo 1411
ELO gap
5.5Overall Elo 1409
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
1.7
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
4.5
Minutes 14d
8.8
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gengel M.Broom C.
Freshness·
—
77

Broom C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 30 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Walton A.[1]
Kubler J.
7-667-64
Semi-finals
Kubler J.
Langmo C.
6-46-4
Walton A.[1]
Jasika O.[6]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Jasika O.[6]
Tu L.[4]
2-67-56-2
Langmo C.
Shimizu Y.[5]
6-46-756-3
Kubler J.
Mccabe J.[8]
7-616-1
Walton A.[1]
Ilagan A.
6-36-4
R16
Tu L.[4]
Delaney J.
6-06-776-4
Jasika O.[6]
Gengel M.
7-613-66-3
Kubler J.
Hsu Y.
6-26-1
Walton A.[1]
Moriya H.
6-36-4
Ilagan A.
Imamura M.
2-67-636-0
Mccabe J.[8]
Hulme M.
6-36-4
Langmo C.
Janvier M.
5-76-46-4
Shimizu Y.[5]
Ogura K.
6-22-66-1
R32
Delaney J.
Marinkov P.
7-653-67-65
Hulme M.
Zhou Y.
0-66-46-4
Ogura K.
Nakagawa N.
7-647-65
Moriya H.
Weber A.
6-46-2
Ilagan A.
Saitoh K.
7-56-2
Janvier M.
Bolt A.[3]
6-46-4
Kubler J.
Schoolkate T.[2]
6-43-66-3
Jasika O.[6]
Ellis B.
6-36-2
Hsu Y.
Bouzige M.
7-57-62
Shimizu Y.[5]
Matsuoka H.
6-33-66-3
Tu L.[4]
Shiraishi H.
6-16-1
Langmo C.
Sweeny D.
6-26-2
Walton A.[1]
Nanda G.
6-26-4
Imamura M.
Tomic B.[7]
6-23-66-2
Mccabe J.[8]
Bradshaw J.
6-36-1
Gengel M.
Broom C.
6-16-2