Xin Yu Wang vs Rebecca Marino — Singapore Round of 32

Singapore · WTA · Round of 32
CHN4
Xin Yu Wang
1760ELO
1716Hard ELO
24 yrs · 182 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 January 2025
hard
CAN
Rebecca Marino
#361WTA
1626ELO
1591Hard ELO
35 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
Wang X.
6-4 5-7 7-5
Marino R.
Wang X.
6572
Marino R.
4751

Xin Yu Wang defeated Rebecca Marino 6-4 5-7 7-5 in the Singapore round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wang X.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Marino R.

Marino R.serving79% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Wang X.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Wang X.Marino R.
25
Serve
—
40
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wang X.Marino R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
45%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
42%
40%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.2
8.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.3
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (69 vs 34). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wang X.Marino R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
60
32
Break points saved·Slight edge
86
81
Break points won·Dominant
78
28
Deciding sets·Dominant
86
33
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wang X.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Marino R.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.6+125 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.4Hard Elo 1591
6.8Overall Elo 1760
ELO gap
3.2Overall Elo 1626
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
5.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
8.7
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Mertens E.[2]
Li A.
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Li A.
Kalinskaya A.[1]
7-621-0
Mertens E.[2]
Wang X.[4]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Li A.
Birrell K.
7-627-64
Mertens E.[2]
Osorio C.[6]
6-46-2
Wang X.[4]
Teichmann J.
6-757-656-4
Kalinskaya A.[1]
Sawangkaew M.
6-34-66-0
R16
Birrell K.
Baptiste H.
6-736-37-5
Sawangkaew M.
Bucsa C.
6-46-4
Kalinskaya A.[1]
Waltert S.
6-27-63
Li A.
Timofeeva M.
6-36-2
Osorio C.[6]
Salkova D.
3-66-26-4
Mertens E.[2]
Maria T.
6-736-36-1
Wang X.[4]
Joint M.
6-46-2
Teichmann J.
Gadecki O.
6-46-4
R32
Timofeeva M.
Wang X.
6-37-63
Wang X.[4]
Marino R.
6-45-77-5
Salkova D.
Andreeva E.
7-656-2
Birrell K.
Kudermetova P.[5]
6-36-2
Osorio C.[6]
Pera B.
6-16-706-3
Bucsa C.
Raducanu E.[7]
5-77-57-5
Maria T.
Starodubtseva Y.
2-66-16-2
Sawangkaew M.
Wei S.
6-47-62
Li A.
Saville D.
6-36-1
Teichmann J.
Dart H.
6-36-1
Joint M.
Parks A.
4-66-17-5
Mertens E.[2]
Townsend T.
6-16-0
Waltert S.
Tomljanovic A.
6-26-3
Kalinskaya A.[1]
Dolehide C.
6-44-66-2
Baptiste H.
Zarazua R.
2-66-06-3
Gadecki O.
Uchijima M.[8]
6-16-716-2