Ann Li vs Daria Saville — Singapore Round of 32

Singapore · WTA · Round of 32
Ann Li
USA
Ann Li
#31WTA
1807ELO
1746Hard ELO
$718kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
26 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 January 2025
hard
AUS
Daria Saville
32 yrs · 166 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLLWLL
Li A.
6-3 6-1
Saville D.
Li A.
662
Saville D.
310

Ann Li defeated Daria Saville 6-3 6-1 in the Singapore round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Li A.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Saville D.

Saville D.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Li A.

Serve advantage — Li A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Li A.Saville D.
47
Serve
—
49
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Li A.Saville D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
62%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
41%
Service points won·Even
58%
55%
Return points won·Even
43%
44%
Break points saved·Even
56%
52%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.7
2.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.3
5.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (73 vs 28). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Li A.Saville D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
76
64
Break points saved·Even
83
79
Break points won·Even
87
87
Deciding sets·Clear edge
87
70
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
67
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Li A.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Saville D.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
5.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
8.5
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Li A.Saville D.
Freshness·
100
—

Li A.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Mertens E.[2]
Li A.
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Li A.
Kalinskaya A.[1]
7-621-0
Mertens E.[2]
Wang X.[4]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Li A.
Birrell K.
7-627-64
Mertens E.[2]
Osorio C.[6]
6-46-2
Wang X.[4]
Teichmann J.
6-757-656-4
Kalinskaya A.[1]
Sawangkaew M.
6-34-66-0
R16
Birrell K.
Baptiste H.
6-736-37-5
Sawangkaew M.
Bucsa C.
6-46-4
Kalinskaya A.[1]
Waltert S.
6-27-63
Li A.
Timofeeva M.
6-36-2
Osorio C.[6]
Salkova D.
3-66-26-4
Mertens E.[2]
Maria T.
6-736-36-1
Wang X.[4]
Joint M.
6-46-2
Teichmann J.
Gadecki O.
6-46-4
R32
Timofeeva M.
Wang X.
6-37-63
Wang X.[4]
Marino R.
6-45-77-5
Salkova D.
Andreeva E.
7-656-2
Birrell K.
Kudermetova P.[5]
6-36-2
Osorio C.[6]
Pera B.
6-16-706-3
Bucsa C.
Raducanu E.[7]
5-77-57-5
Maria T.
Starodubtseva Y.
2-66-16-2
Sawangkaew M.
Wei S.
6-47-62
Li A.
Saville D.
6-36-1
Teichmann J.
Dart H.
6-36-1
Joint M.
Parks A.
4-66-17-5
Mertens E.[2]
Townsend T.
6-16-0
Waltert S.
Tomljanovic A.
6-26-3
Kalinskaya A.[1]
Dolehide C.
6-44-66-2
Baptiste H.
Zarazua R.
2-66-06-3
Gadecki O.
Uchijima M.[8]
6-16-716-2