Bernard Tomic vs Jason Kubler — Brisbane 1 CH Round of 16

Brisbane 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Bernard Tomic
AUS8
Bernard Tomic
#204ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 January 2025
hard
AUS
Jason Kubler
#465ATP
1685ELO
1635Hard ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWLLW
Tomic B.
6-3 6-7 7-6
Kubler J.
Tomic B.
666772
Kubler J.
378631

Bernard Tomic defeated Jason Kubler 6-3 6-7 7-6 in the Brisbane 1 CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Bernard Tomic closed it out in three sets, 6–3 6–7 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kubler J.

Kubler J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Serve advantage — Kubler J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Kubler J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
64%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.5
6.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.6
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 38). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tomic B.Kubler J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
53
59
Break points saved·Even
92
90
Break points won·Dominant
4
46
Deciding sets·Slight edge
74
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Kubler J.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.9Hard Elo 1441
Surface ELO
7.1+194 Hard Elo edge
2.9Overall Elo 1475
ELO gap
7.1Overall Elo 1685
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.3
Surface form
2.3
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
9.4
Minutes 14d
8.8
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Kubler J.
Freshness·
75
—

Tomic B.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Schoolkate T.[5]
Gengel M.
7-637-64
Semi-finals
Gengel M.
Jasika O.[6]
7-646-3
Schoolkate T.[5]
Walton A.[2]
4-66-37-65
Quarter-finals
Schoolkate T.[5]
Bolt A.[4]
6-37-5
Walton A.[2]
Tomic B.[8]
6-47-5
Gengel M.
Ellis B.
6-43-67-5
Jasika O.[6]
Mccabe J.
6-776-27-5
R16
Mccabe J.
Hijikata R.[1]
6-47-5
Jasika O.[6]
Langmo C.
7-57-5
Gengel M.
Shimizu Y.[7]
3-66-46-0
Bolt A.[4]
Nanda G.
4-67-687-64
Tomic B.[8]
Kubler J.
6-36-767-63
Schoolkate T.[5]
Dellavedova M.
6-27-66
Ellis B.
Marinkov P.
6-47-5
Walton A.[2]
Hazawa S.
6-46-3
R32
Hazawa S.
Isomura K.
6-41-0
Dellavedova M.
Sweeny D.
6-36-3
Kubler J.
Moriya H.
6-06-4
Langmo C.
Marchenko I.
6-46-3
Nanda G.
Janvier M.
1-67-667-5
Tomic B.[8]
Broom C.
6-10-67-63
Schoolkate T.[5]
Zhou Y.
7-56-3
Marinkov P.
Brumm J.
6-34-66-2
Mccabe J.
Bouzige M.
6-17-64
Bolt A.[4]
Hulme M.
7-56-3
Hijikata R.[1]
Jones H.
6-736-46-0
Walton A.[2]
Ilagan A.
6-26-4
Jasika O.[6]
Bradshaw J.
6-36-1
Gengel M.
Nakagawa N.
6-46-3
Ellis B.
Tu L.[3]
7-636-4
Shimizu Y.[7]
Imamura M.
6-46-4