Maya Joint vs Alycia Parks — Singapore Round of 32

Singapore · WTA · Round of 32
Maya Joint
AUS
Maya Joint
#77WTA
1659ELO
1657Hard ELO
$391kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
20 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 January 2025
hard
Alycia Parks
USA
Alycia Parks
#70WTA
1648ELO
1639Hard ELO
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLWL
Joint M.
4-6 6-1 7-5
Parks A.
Joint M.
4672
Parks A.
6151

Maya Joint defeated Alycia Parks 4-6 6-1 7-5 in the Singapore round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Alycia Parks came in ranked #70.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Joint M.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Parks A.

Parks A.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Joint M.

Serve advantage — Joint M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Joint M.Parks A.
17
Serve
28
45
Return
20

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Joint M.Parks A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
61%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
44%
Service points won·Even
56%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
47%
41%
Break points saved·Even
52%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.4
6.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.2
6.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (85 vs 80). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Joint M.Parks A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
77
61
Break points saved·Even
76
79
Break points won·Dominant
99
66
Deciding sets·Clear edge
77
64
Tiebreaks·
—
87

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Joint M.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Parks A.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.5+18 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Hard Elo 1639
5.6Overall Elo 1659
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1648
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.9
Surface form
7.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.4
Minutes 14d
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Joint M.Parks A.
Freshness·Even
93
97

Joint M.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Parks A.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Mertens E.[2]
Li A.
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Li A.
Kalinskaya A.[1]
7-621-0
Mertens E.[2]
Wang X.[4]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Li A.
Birrell K.
7-627-64
Mertens E.[2]
Osorio C.[6]
6-46-2
Wang X.[4]
Teichmann J.
6-757-656-4
Kalinskaya A.[1]
Sawangkaew M.
6-34-66-0
R16
Birrell K.
Baptiste H.
6-736-37-5
Sawangkaew M.
Bucsa C.
6-46-4
Kalinskaya A.[1]
Waltert S.
6-27-63
Li A.
Timofeeva M.
6-36-2
Osorio C.[6]
Salkova D.
3-66-26-4
Mertens E.[2]
Maria T.
6-736-36-1
Wang X.[4]
Joint M.
6-46-2
Teichmann J.
Gadecki O.
6-46-4
R32
Timofeeva M.
Wang X.
6-37-63
Wang X.[4]
Marino R.
6-45-77-5
Salkova D.
Andreeva E.
7-656-2
Birrell K.
Kudermetova P.[5]
6-36-2
Osorio C.[6]
Pera B.
6-16-706-3
Bucsa C.
Raducanu E.[7]
5-77-57-5
Maria T.
Starodubtseva Y.
2-66-16-2
Sawangkaew M.
Wei S.
6-47-62
Li A.
Saville D.
6-36-1
Teichmann J.
Dart H.
6-36-1
Joint M.
Parks A.
4-66-17-5
Mertens E.[2]
Townsend T.
6-16-0
Waltert S.
Tomljanovic A.
6-26-3
Kalinskaya A.[1]
Dolehide C.
6-44-66-2
Baptiste H.
Zarazua R.
2-66-06-3
Gadecki O.
Uchijima M.[8]
6-16-716-2