Tyler Zink vs Brandon Holt — Cleveland CH Round of 16

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Tyler Zink
#326ATP
1371ELO
1351Hard ELO
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWWLW
—
Sets
Walkover
Monday, 27 January 2025
hard
USA5
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Zink T.
vs
Holt B.

Tyler Zink advanced past Brandon Holt via walkover in the Cleveland CH round of 16.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zink T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Holt B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Zink T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zink T.Holt B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Even
5.7
5.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
0.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (72 vs 76). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zink T.
3.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 77 days (−1.2)
Holt B.
7.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.2Hard Elo 1351
Surface ELO
6.8+156 Hard Elo edge
3.2Overall Elo 1371
ELO gap
6.8Overall Elo 1537
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.8
Surface form
8.3
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
4.3
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Zink T.Holt B.
Freshness·
85
—

Zink T.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Smith C.
Spizzirri E.[6]
6-46-766-3
Semi-finals
Spizzirri E.[6]
Zink T.
6-46-3
Smith C.
Wolf J.[8]
7-676-1
Quarter-finals
Wolf J.[8]
Kozlov S.
6-16-3
Zink T.
Cassone M.
6-747-617-5
Smith C.
Sell K.[7]
7-646-2
Spizzirri E.[6]
Trotter J.[4]
5-76-37-64
R16
Zink T.
Holt B.[5]
W/O
Spizzirri E.[6]
Mmoh M.
6-47-5
Cassone M.
Aguilar J.
6-16-4
Trotter J.[4]
Hilderbrand T.
6-736-26-4
Wolf J.[8]
Ghibaudo A.
7-6114-66-3
Kozlov S.
Bigun K.
6-26-3
Smith C.
Dostanic S.
6-46-4
Sell K.[7]
Kingsley C.
6-46-4
R32
Ghibaudo A.
Mccormick T.
6-36-3
Spizzirri E.[6]
Escobedo E.
6-46-3
Mmoh M.
Rybakov A.
6-736-36-2
Sell K.[7]
Ayeni O.
6-37-65
Wolf J.[8]
Brooksby J.
6-26-4
Zink T.
Mayo A.
6-36-4
Kingsley C.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-16-4
Dostanic S.
Seggerman R.
7-687-5
Aguilar J.
Ross J.
6-46-2
Holt B.[5]
Ivanovski K.
6-16-1
Smith C.
Quinn E.[3]
1-66-16-4
Bigun K.
Albot R.[2]
6-37-67
Cassone M.
Gomez F.[1]
7-656-4
Trotter J.[4]
Pieczonka F.
6-33-67-64
Hilderbrand T.
Ponwith N.
7-654-66-0
Kozlov S.
Braswell M.
4-66-36-4