Marek Gengel vs Omar Jasika — Brisbane 1 CH Semi-final

Brisbane 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Marek Gengel
CZE
Marek Gengel
#373ATP
1411ELO
1377Hard ELO
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 January 2025
hard
AUS6
Omar Jasika
#528ATP
1296ELO
1272Hard ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Gengel M.
7-6 6-3
Jasika O.
Gengel M.
7762
Jasika O.
6430

Marek Gengel defeated Omar Jasika 7-6 6-3 in the Brisbane 1 CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Marek Gengel closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gengel M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Jasika O.

Jasika O.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Gengel M.

Serve advantage — Gengel M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gengel M.Jasika O.
1st serve in·Even
62%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
57%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.3
2.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (58 vs 64). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gengel M.Jasika O.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
11
0
Break points saved·Clear edge
35
47
Break points won·Even
11
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
53
13
Tiebreaks·Even
4
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gengel M.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Jasika O.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.0+105 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.0Hard Elo 1272
6.1Overall Elo 1411
ELO gap
3.9Overall Elo 1296
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.2
Surface form
3.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
8.5
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Schoolkate T.[5]
Gengel M.
7-637-64
Semi-finals
Gengel M.
Jasika O.[6]
7-646-3
Schoolkate T.[5]
Walton A.[2]
4-66-37-65
Quarter-finals
Schoolkate T.[5]
Bolt A.[4]
6-37-5
Walton A.[2]
Tomic B.[8]
6-47-5
Gengel M.
Ellis B.
6-43-67-5
Jasika O.[6]
Mccabe J.
6-776-27-5
R16
Mccabe J.
Hijikata R.[1]
6-47-5
Jasika O.[6]
Langmo C.
7-57-5
Gengel M.
Shimizu Y.[7]
3-66-46-0
Bolt A.[4]
Nanda G.
4-67-687-64
Tomic B.[8]
Kubler J.
6-36-767-63
Schoolkate T.[5]
Dellavedova M.
6-27-66
Ellis B.
Marinkov P.
6-47-5
Walton A.[2]
Hazawa S.
6-46-3
R32
Hazawa S.
Isomura K.
6-41-0
Dellavedova M.
Sweeny D.
6-36-3
Kubler J.
Moriya H.
6-06-4
Langmo C.
Marchenko I.
6-46-3
Nanda G.
Janvier M.
1-67-667-5
Tomic B.[8]
Broom C.
6-10-67-63
Schoolkate T.[5]
Zhou Y.
7-56-3
Marinkov P.
Brumm J.
6-34-66-2
Mccabe J.
Bouzige M.
6-17-64
Bolt A.[4]
Hulme M.
7-56-3
Hijikata R.[1]
Jones H.
6-736-46-0
Walton A.[2]
Ilagan A.
6-26-4
Jasika O.[6]
Bradshaw J.
6-36-1
Gengel M.
Nakagawa N.
6-46-3
Ellis B.
Tu L.[3]
7-636-4
Shimizu Y.[7]
Imamura M.
6-46-4